Author Topic: Thomas McMahon  (Read 2173 times)

Offline stephenperry

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 8
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Thomas McMahon
« on: Wednesday 21 October 15 07:31 BST (UK) »
Has anyone got a birth record of a Thomas McMahon born Galway Ireland c1860/64
his father was Daniel McMahon and his mother was Ann Fuery/Tuohy/Twohy
He emigrated to New Zealand c1883 where in 1896 he married a Jane McKinna

Thanks

Offline Sinann

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,295
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas McMahon
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 21 October 15 07:58 BST (UK) »
You can look here http://registers.nli.ie/ but it is not searchable by name so if you don't know which parish it won't be easy.
There are births to a Daniel McMahon and Anne Twohy on FamilySearch in Mountshannon so that would be a good place to start, it's covered by Clonrush parish which straddles counties Clare and Galway.

Offline taramcdsmall

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,394
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas McMahon
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 21 October 15 12:24 BST (UK) »
Hi There

Just to add to Sinann's finds.

Daughter Maria

https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F529-93P

Son John

https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FR49-W58

Tara

Offline taramcdsmall

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,394
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas McMahon
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday 21 October 15 12:30 BST (UK) »
Mountshannon records are here but YIKES they are hard to read and there appears to be chunks missing around the timeline you are looking at

http://registers.nli.ie/parishes/0773

Tara


Offline stephenperry

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 8
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Thomas McMahon
« Reply #4 on: Thursday 22 October 15 01:08 BST (UK) »
Thanks. Yes, very hard to read

Might just leave as is unless somebody comes to light who is also researching that line!