Author Topic: 1939 National Register??  (Read 65740 times)

Offline carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,603
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 National Register??
« Reply #288 on: Sunday 01 November 15 16:37 GMT (UK) »
It certainly holds interest for someone like me who knows very little about my father as I can find out where he was hopefully but it's astronomically priced even with my members discount it's 22.00 for five searches

For most of us that's considerably less than a trip to London to see the records there.
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline carol8353

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,603
  • Me,mum and dad and both gran's c 1955
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 National Register??
« Reply #289 on: Sunday 01 November 15 16:39 GMT (UK) »
After 75 years  I fail to see why there is a need to delete or redact living people?    Current Electoral registers are open registers.

All the current electoral rolls show are names though,unless you're under 18 or older than 70 (past the age of being called up for jury service)

They do not have a personal info that the 1939 register has.
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline P136_XWRO

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 87
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 National Register??
« Reply #290 on: Sunday 01 November 15 17:16 GMT (UK) »
At the end of the day, the costs are extortionate and a profit making venture for FindMyPast. I am sure that there may be a number of pensioners who are subscribers who may not be able to afford these costs, especially if they have extensive trees. Clearly, from what I read on the FindMyPast blog, there are countless others who find it too expensive.

I agree entirely, so I made a petition against the extortionate costs FindMyPast are asking. http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/FindMyPast-1939-register-charge

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 43,996
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 National Register??
« Reply #291 on: Sunday 01 November 15 17:19 GMT (UK) »
At the end of the day, the costs are extortionate and a profit making venture for FindMyPast. I am sure that there may be a number of pensioners who are subscribers who may not be able to afford these costs, especially if they have extensive trees. Clearly, from what I read on the FindMyPast blog, there are countless others who find it too expensive.

I agree entirely, so I made a petition against the extortionate costs FindMyPast are asking. http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/FindMyPast-1939-register-charge

Your petition link gives me Page not found  ::)  Not that I intend signing it   ???
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Torwoodlee

  • I have turned off notifications to all my topics
  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 National Register??
« Reply #292 on: Sunday 01 November 15 17:46 GMT (UK) »
It seems that a number of people aren't happy on the FindMyPast American site as well.
Names:  Laidlaw, Alexander, Park, Templeton, Hood, Sanderson, Fairbairn, Davidson, Delgatty, Greig
Areas:  Galashiels Selkirkshire, Ladhope Roxburghshire, Jedburgh Roxburghshire, Morebattle Roxburghshire, Tillicoultry Clackmannanshire

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,147
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 National Register??
« Reply #293 on: Sunday 01 November 15 18:04 GMT (UK) »
I'm sorry, but I really can't see why people expect a commercial firm like FindMyPast to make this set of records free or very cheap to the general public. They are there to make a profit and recoup what it has cost them to scan etc, not to provide a free service. If a government department had done all the scanning etc that would be different.

Genealogy isn't a cheap hobby. Although there are plenty of free resources, if we want to dig deeper it is going to cost us.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online Jebber

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 5,664
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 National Register??
« Reply #294 on: Sunday 01 November 15 18:17 GMT (UK) »
I'm sorry, but I really can't see why people expect a commercial firm like FindMyPast to make this set of records free or very cheap to the general public. They are there to make a profit and recoup what it has cost them to scan etc, not to provide a free service. If a government department had done all the scanning etc that would be different.

Genealogy isn't a cheap hobby. Although there are plenty of free resources, if we want to dig deeper it is going to cost us.

I couldn't agree more. When you break down the subscription costs to weekly, my World subscription  to FindMyPast cost less than £3.00. To expect them to go on adding data without extra charge is unrealistic.
CHOULES All ,  COKER Harwich Essex & Rochester Kent 
COLE Gt. Oakley, & Lt. Oakley, Essex.
DUNCAN Kent
EVERITT Colchester,  Dovercourt & Harwich Essex
GULLIVER/GULLOFER Fifehead Magdalen Dorset
HORSCROFT Kent.
KING Sturminster Newton, Dorset. MONK Odiham Ham.
SCOTT Wrabness, Essex
WILKINS Stour Provost, Dorset.
WICKHAM All in North Essex.
WICKHAM Medway Towns, Kent from 1880
WICKHAM, Ipswich, Suffolk.

Online rosie99

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 43,996
  • ALFIE 2009 - 2021 (Rosbercon Sky's the Limit)
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 National Register??
« Reply #295 on: Sunday 01 November 15 18:17 GMT (UK) »
Well said groom  ;D   I agree with you.

Rosie
Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline ReadyDale

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 702
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: 1939 National Register??
« Reply #296 on: Sunday 01 November 15 18:28 GMT (UK) »
I think FindMyPast have handled the pricing side of this very badly.
Until fairly recently, they din't even say whether or not this would be covered under existing subs (surely an easy thing to announce, even if they were still unsure of exactly how much to charge). Then to keep the exact amount quiet until around a week in advance smacks of trying to get everyone hooked before breaking the bad news. I'm sure they handled the 1911 far better.
They then shot themselves in the foot by the e-mail which announced the un-discounted and "un-bulked" first. I for one had the first reaction of "HOW MUCH!!" when I saw the first line of £6.95 per household, especially for something that may well be heavily redacted.
However, once the 28% discount for buying 5 households is accounted for and the any special codes (I have a 25% code from FindMyPast and a 10% code from the 1939 newsletter, with another 10% code promised from Genes), this all brings it down to a more managable figure - either 54% or 65% of that topline cost (or around 40% of a single cert). Bearing in mind the digitising work needed, not to mention the ongoing redaction work required. This is more of an understandable level.
I do think, however, that FindMyPast and Anc should view new record sets as a means of keeping existing subscribers. Afterall, as you progress through your tree, the record sets you use at the beginning are often not the same ones you consult a few years down the line.
Will I be indulging? Well, I think I will see what can be gleaned from the free searches and what the comments are from the "early birds", before I take the plunge. As I mentioned on page 3 of this thread, Ancestry have just hit me with a 12% increase for an unchanged sub, so Tree money is tighter than it was.

One question I haven't seen on here yet. If you use your 60 credits to see a particular household, do you just get that as a one-off (i.e. if you want to refer back, you have to save it down) or will the system remeber you have "bought" that record? And leading on from that, if it remembers and if that household has redactions, will you automatically see any redacted people as they become open as over 100 years (assuming you don't get them unlocked by sending certs) or will you have to re-buy it?