Author Topic: Ancestry trees  (Read 42383 times)

Offline jaybelnz

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,762
  • My Runaway Bride! Thanks to Paula Too!
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry trees
« Reply #117 on: Thursday 07 May 15 00:46 BST (UK) »
Chill out!  You just gotta laugh!  Why worry about it? .

Someone has me on a My Heritage tree married to my father!  And our children are my brothers!  My darling Mum doesn't even get a look in!  So what!  Not my problem!

Also several other crazy connections!  Just makes me laugh!  Their loss, not mine! Why worry! 
It's their money that's been wasted!

Jeanne😄
"We analyse the evidence to draw a conclusion. The better the sources and information, the stronger the evidence, which leads to a reliable conclusion!" Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk.

MATHEWS, Ireland, England, USA & Canada, NZ
FLEMING,   Ireland
DUNNELL,  England
PAULSON,  England
DOUGLAS, Scotland, Ireland, NZ
WALKER,   Scotland
WATSON,  England, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
McAUGHTRIE, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
MASON,     Scotland, England, NZ
& Connections

Offline dbree

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Canada
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry trees
« Reply #118 on: Thursday 07 May 15 00:55 BST (UK) »
So agree jaybelnz, if I worried about every misstep/error that people made I'd be crazier than
I am already am. ;D ;D ;D

Cheers,
DB

Offline jaybelnz

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,762
  • My Runaway Bride! Thanks to Paula Too!
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry trees
« Reply #119 on: Thursday 07 May 15 01:23 BST (UK) »
 ;D ;D ;D.

Absolutely "dead" right CB.  And your logo says it all too! 👍

Jeanne 😄
"We analyse the evidence to draw a conclusion. The better the sources and information, the stronger the evidence, which leads to a reliable conclusion!" Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk.

MATHEWS, Ireland, England, USA & Canada, NZ
FLEMING,   Ireland
DUNNELL,  England
PAULSON,  England
DOUGLAS, Scotland, Ireland, NZ
WALKER,   Scotland
WATSON,  England, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
McAUGHTRIE, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
MASON,     Scotland, England, NZ
& Connections

Offline jettejjane

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,142
  • Dad - 9 times Mayor of Arundel
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry trees
« Reply #120 on: Thursday 07 May 15 08:24 BST (UK) »
Chill out!  You just gotta laugh!  Why worry about i

Jeanne😄


I do laugh  and although when I see errors it bugs me I don't worry about it. Perhaps I should re-evaluate some of my comments. I don't want to fall out with anyone ;D We all differ somewhat with our views and how we approach our research.

It's ok Jeanne I am chilled-call me sub-zero. My tree is accurate that's all that matters at the end of the day.

Jane ;)
Redman, Jupp, Brockhurst of West Sussex
Moore County Down. Redman of Posey, Indiana, USA Emigrated 1820


Offline jaybelnz

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,762
  • My Runaway Bride! Thanks to Paula Too!
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry trees
« Reply #121 on: Thursday 07 May 15 08:58 BST (UK) »
All good Jane, we all get annoyed, no doubt about that, but I say ....if they've got it wrong - their problem not mine  ;D.   I take my annoyances out on the weeds that are harder to get rid of in my garden!  Once I've mangled them and sprayed any remains with weed killer, they've gone! 😄😄

And I really do love DB's logo! 

Cheers
Jeanne 👍
"We analyse the evidence to draw a conclusion. The better the sources and information, the stronger the evidence, which leads to a reliable conclusion!" Census information is Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk.

MATHEWS, Ireland, England, USA & Canada, NZ
FLEMING,   Ireland
DUNNELL,  England
PAULSON,  England
DOUGLAS, Scotland, Ireland, NZ
WALKER,   Scotland
WATSON,  England, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
McAUGHTRIE, Ayrshire, Scotland, NZ
MASON,     Scotland, England, NZ
& Connections

Offline cocksie

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 538
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry trees
« Reply #122 on: Thursday 07 May 15 10:04 BST (UK) »
Most enjoyable thread although somewhat disconcerting to discover that my son and I are both reincarnations of Isabella I of Castille .....
As to trees on the Internet that appear wildly inaccurate - leads me to reflecting on what I think I know is accurate on my tree (which sits quietly on my computer). All I really know is that Joe appears to have been brought up by Bob.  Bob is listed on the census in a way that indicates he is the father of Joe. Bob is listed on the baptism register as the father of Joe. All data and documents indicate that Bob is the biological father but how do I really know what Mary (the mother) was really up to nine months before the birth of her son, Joe? I don't. All I can really deduce is that there is a pretty high probability that Bob is the biological father and clear documentation that he was the "nurturing" father.
Cocksie
Hallidays of Northowram, Roberts of Hovingham, Stampers of Kirkdale, Cocks of Mary Tavy Devon, Cocks of Redruth Cornwall, Manser of Sussex, Axel of East Sussex, Palmer of East Sussex, Hermitage of Sussex, Smale of Kent, Haddon of Devon, Cuthill of Kinross-shire, Lynn of Ireland, Seymour of Cork

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,147
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry trees
« Reply #123 on: Thursday 07 May 15 10:19 BST (UK) »
That is very true, Cocksie. None of us can say with 100% certainty that our tree is accurate, it is just as accurate as we think we can get it from the information available. Just one little slip up by an ancestor along the way could mean that, unknown to us, we end up following the wrong father.

Genealogy is supposed to be a hobby and a hobby is something you do for fun and enjoyment. The day it makes me really cross, annoyed, upset etc is the day I stop doing it. I have now reached the stage when I know that nothing said on here, or other genealogical forums, will change the minds of people who have have wrong information on their trees. After all those people are so convinced they are right that they probably don't participate in forums, or if they do, they don't think what is being said applies to them .
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Mike in Cumbria

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,776
    • View Profile
Re: Inaccurate Ancestry trees
« Reply #124 on: Thursday 07 May 15 10:35 BST (UK) »

Offline Flattybasher9

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,364
  • Manners cost nothing, and are worth the effort.
    • View Profile
Re: Ancestry trees
« Reply #125 on: Thursday 07 May 15 11:01 BST (UK) »
Perhaps the Ancestry arborist's are living in the third dimention.

Regards

Malky