Author Topic: Ancestry trees  (Read 42316 times)

Offline jettejjane

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,142
  • Dad - 9 times Mayor of Arundel
    • View Profile
Re: Inaccurate Ancestry trees
« Reply #45 on: Tuesday 21 April 15 14:51 BST (UK) »
Keep your comments coming on RootsChat - get it off your chest.

You're all entitled to opinions of family trees posted somewhere or other, even if other people have posted before on the subject.

After all that's the "chat" in RootsChat.

Trystan
RootsChat Admin

Thanks Trystan. I agree a nice healthy discussion/ debate or just a chat is what this site is all about.

What I was trying to say badly earlier about previous postings on the same subject  is that not everyone,  especially newcomers may have seen those other  posts.  Also if people are fed up with the repetition of this subject  why are those same people  joining in this one?  I am joining in because I want to and find it interesting. 

No way am I blaming Ancestry for the mistakes in trees it is the tree owner who is (in my opinion) at fault for lack of research.

Jane
Redman, Jupp, Brockhurst of West Sussex
Moore County Down. Redman of Posey, Indiana, USA Emigrated 1820

Offline Alexander.

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,306
    • View Profile
Re: Inaccurate Ancestry trees
« Reply #46 on: Tuesday 21 April 15 17:39 BST (UK) »
I don't know about 'junk' trees Trystan, but the one mentioned by Mike in his opening post boasts 1/3 million people.  Over 300,000 updates every day!  Now I don't believe a single person could possibly manage that on his own so who is helping?    Of course, as usual I stand to be corrected by some expert or other.

The 300,000 updates a day could possibly suggest that it's an automated thing?

1/3 million people = about 300,000 people.
The tree is updated everyday.

Offline LizzieL

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,089
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Inaccurate Ancestry trees
« Reply #47 on: Tuesday 21 April 15 18:05 BST (UK) »
Just checked the tree owner's profile, the head count is now up to 366,980! And he/she has logged in today so heaven knows how many more will be added tomorrow.
Already several generations before Alfred the Great!

Berks / Oxon: Eltham, Annetts, Wiltshire (surname not county), Hawkins, Pembroke, Partridge
Dorset / Hants: Derham, Stride, Purkiss, Sibley
Yorkshire: Pottage, Carr, Blackburn, Depledge
Sussex: Goodyer, Christopher, Trevatt
Lanark: Scott (soldier went to Jersey CI)
Jersey: Fowler, Huelin, Scott

Offline jettejjane

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,142
  • Dad - 9 times Mayor of Arundel
    • View Profile
Re: Inaccurate Ancestry trees
« Reply #48 on: Tuesday 21 April 15 18:09 BST (UK) »
Just checked the tree owner's profile, the head count is now up to 366,980! And he/she has logged in today so heaven knows how many more will be added tomorrow.
Already several generations before Alfred the Great!



Lizzie they will be back to Jesus in a few days.
Redman, Jupp, Brockhurst of West Sussex
Moore County Down. Redman of Posey, Indiana, USA Emigrated 1820


Offline msr

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,256
    • View Profile
Re: Inaccurate Ancestry trees
« Reply #49 on: Tuesday 21 April 15 18:11 BST (UK) »
OK Alexander, I take your point.

Still, creating a tree of 366980 people in 7 1/2 years is still some feat, no matter how many daily updates there are.

1000s of records, photographs, stories.  Must not sleep.

With you there LizzieL  ;)

And you Jane  ;)




Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,742
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Inaccurate Ancestry trees
« Reply #50 on: Tuesday 21 April 15 18:13 BST (UK) »
Small things amuse small minds  ;D ;D  And I'm not going to qualify that  ::) Live and let live  8)  Who cares?
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline msr

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,256
    • View Profile
Re: Inaccurate Ancestry trees
« Reply #51 on: Tuesday 21 April 15 18:16 BST (UK) »
Small things amuse small minds  ;D ;D  And I'm not going to qualify that  ::) Live and let live  8)  Who cares?

You must care enough to comment BumbleB, as is your prerogative.
Small minds indeed ::)

Offline Flattybasher9

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,364
  • Manners cost nothing, and are worth the effort.
    • View Profile
Re: Inaccurate Ancestry trees
« Reply #52 on: Tuesday 21 April 15 18:21 BST (UK) »
Just remember, we are all related in one way or another. Just, some are more distant than others.

Regards

Malky

Offline jettejjane

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,142
  • Dad - 9 times Mayor of Arundel
    • View Profile
Re: Inaccurate Ancestry trees
« Reply #53 on: Tuesday 21 April 15 18:35 BST (UK) »
Small things amuse small minds  ;D ;D  And I'm not going to qualify that  ::) Live and let live  8)  Who cares?

You must care enough to comment BumbleB, as is your prerogative.
Small minds indeed ::)

Here, here msr ;D  There is another line to add to that small minds comment but wouldnt dare mention it here. I am on my best behaviour. Hard for me but had my wrists slapped too often in here so it's a new me. For how long ??????

Redman, Jupp, Brockhurst of West Sussex
Moore County Down. Redman of Posey, Indiana, USA Emigrated 1820