Author Topic: Wording on a WW1 Army Form  (Read 938 times)

Offline Runnicus

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 16
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Wording on a WW1 Army Form
« on: Friday 21 November 14 16:04 GMT (UK) »
Hello Forum,

Can anyone decipher the first line of these two remarks on my grandfather's Army Form Z.18 Certificate of Employment During the War?

I think the second line is "Well Considered - or Conducted - Soldier"

But the first line is illegible to me. Does it say 15 Pair?  Pair of what?  And 15 doesn't make a pair of anything...Help...

Online Treetotal

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 28,509
    • View Profile
Re: Wording on a WW1 Army Form
« Reply #1 on: Friday 21 November 14 16:05 GMT (UK) »
Did you forget to attach the image?
Carol
CAPES Hull. KIRK  Leeds, Hull. JONES  Wales,  Lancashire. CARROLL Ireland, Lancashire, U.S.A. BROUGHTON Leicester, Goole, Hull BORRILL  Lincolnshire, Durham, Hull. GROOM  Wishbech, Hull. ANTHONY St. John's Nfld. BUCKNALL Lincolnshire, Hull. BUTT Harbour Grace, Newfoundland. PARSONS  Western Bay, Newfoundland. MONAGHAN  Ireland, U.S.A. PERRY Cheshire, Liverpool.
 
RESTORERS:PLEASE DO NOT USE MY RESTORES WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION - THANK YOU

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,876
    • View Profile
Re: Wording on a WW1 Army Form
« Reply #2 on: Friday 21 November 14 16:23 GMT (UK) »

Hi

I think it says:

trained with 15 Paras from acpt  (acceptance?)
well considered soldier

Gadget
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=877762.0

Offline alanmack

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 664
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Wording on a WW1 Army Form
« Reply #3 on: Friday 21 November 14 16:30 GMT (UK) »
trained with 15 Paras from acpt  (acceptance?)
well considered soldier

a. not "considered" but "conducted"

b not Paras as this is a WW1 form
Glamorgan - Carpenter, Chamberlain, Ellis, Watkins, Rees, Bevan
Wiltshire - Carpenter, Chamberlain, Ellis, Merrett
Essex - Burdon, Taylor, Menzies
Canada - Burdon, Parkinson
Australia - Carpenter, Burdon


Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,876
    • View Profile
Re: Wording on a WW1 Army Form
« Reply #4 on: Friday 21 November 14 16:38 GMT (UK) »
I see it was Royal Welch* - it's not Bat -  so what is it ? 

* Welsh but my Grandad and two uncles and other family members served with the RWF and we still spell  it Welch  :)


Added - there was a 15th Battalion of RWF:

http://www.royalwelsh.org.uk/regiment/history-regiment-timeline.htm
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=877762.0

Offline km1971

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 9,343
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Wording on a WW1 Army Form
« Reply #5 on: Friday 28 November 14 14:12 GMT (UK) »
Can you post a link to his records. There may be some clue in the jobs he was given.

Ken

Offline barryd

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,709
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Wording on a WW1 Army Form
« Reply #6 on: Friday 28 November 14 15:24 GMT (UK) »
I Googled "Well Considered Soldier" to see if the term was used before. He is an example of one World War I veteran who went onto bad things after the end of WWI.

"He was an Austrian who became leader of Germany. He fought in a Bavarian (German state) regiment in WW1 and was a successful and well considered soldier winning the Eisernes Kruez 2 and 1 in combat roles".