Author Topic: Monrath  (Read 5603 times)

Offline kiwihalfpint

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,913
  • Women and Cats will do as they please
    • View Profile
Re: Monrath
« Reply #27 on: Monday 20 October 14 09:34 BST (UK) »
Looks like an transcription error Minnie, on Marriage Disc and Kiwi Index it is definitely Charles Monrath Woodward.


Cheers
KHP
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Beg Clonrode...

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 89
    • View Profile
Re: Monrath
« Reply #28 on: Monday 20 October 14 10:17 BST (UK) »
Quote from: kiwihalfpint
Charles Monrath Woodward AKA Carl Monrath is the son of Herman and Clementine Josephine Monrath.

Hi KHP :)

I saw "Herman Monrath" mentioned in PapersPast in Odine's 1890 marriage notice...

http://www.rootschat.com/links/01e0n/

...and I've also seen Odine's 1869 birth register entry so "Herman" is actually Hans Peter RIEVERS.

I wasn't aware you'd seen Herman in a tree for Carl/Charles. Are there any sources mentioned, specifically d.o.b or parish.

I'm half of the opinion that Carl wasn't born in Denmark simply because LDS have Denmark in that period pretty much sorted. I'm wondering if Carl was born en route to London from (possibly) Hamburg, hence the "Germany" in the passenger list.

Regards
Beg

Offline queenie3

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
    • View Profile
Re: Monrath
« Reply #29 on: Monday 20 October 14 10:26 BST (UK) »
I too was wondering about the mystery Herman -  and Hans Peter Rievers. The reason for emigrating to the other side of the world is Hans Rievers - possibly he was already married - this would be the main reason for him not to marry the mother of his children.
Atkinson. Empson. Overton. Lynch. Revell. Wood. Peagram. Stanford-Davis.Savins.

Offline kiwihalfpint

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,913
  • Women and Cats will do as they please
    • View Profile
Re: Monrath
« Reply #30 on: Monday 20 October 14 19:07 BST (UK) »

I wasn't aware you'd seen Herman in a tree for Carl/Charles. Are there any sources mentioned, specifically d.o.b or parish.

Regards
Beg

DOB mentioned in Reply # 7 - 1872

Cheers
KHP
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline kiwihalfpint

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,913
  • Women and Cats will do as they please
    • View Profile
Re: Monrath
« Reply #31 on: Monday 20 October 14 19:29 BST (UK) »
Queenie, I notice the tree owner is one that I have had contact with,  regarding one of my trees, would you like me to see if they would contact you about the family?


Cheers
KHP
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline queenie3

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
    • View Profile
Re: Monrath
« Reply #32 on: Monday 20 October 14 20:03 BST (UK) »
Hi KHP
I would be very pleased if this person wanted to make contact with me.
I am working on behalf of four cousins [whose dear mother had died] and they are interested in finding out more about her family line.
Thank you very much. :)
Queenie
Atkinson. Empson. Overton. Lynch. Revell. Wood. Peagram. Stanford-Davis.Savins.

Offline kiwihalfpint

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,913
  • Women and Cats will do as they please
    • View Profile
Re: Monrath
« Reply #33 on: Monday 20 October 14 20:08 BST (UK) »
Queenie, could you please send me your email addy by PM so I can pass it on :D


Cheers
KHP
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline kiwihalfpint

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,913
  • Women and Cats will do as they please
    • View Profile
Re: Monrath
« Reply #34 on: Monday 20 October 14 20:38 BST (UK) »
Message has been sent to the tree owner. :D


Cheers
KHP
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Beg Clonrode...

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 89
    • View Profile
Re: Monrath
« Reply #35 on: Monday 20 October 14 21:12 BST (UK) »
Quote from: kiwihalfpint
DOB mentioned in Reply # 7 - 1872

That's a y.o.b, not a d.o.b :-)