I've got several dozen here, which don't. They are mostly country people and quite small towns, though. That may be the difference.
Sorry to disagree.
I have a folder sitting in front of my right now, with several dozen certificates in it, and only one of them has a proper address ( even a proper rural address ) on it. You disagree ? Perhaps I should send them to you, and you can point out the addresses I have somehow not noticed on them, written in invisible ink, perhaps ? Or written on the back, and not copied.
Or perhaps I should try and get a PhD research grant from one of the government's heritage slush funds, and go and spend two years to look at all of the records at the registry office, and come up with some soundly based analysis of how many, or what proportion of them, have proper addresses on them. Because the small handfulls of certificates that we have copies of, are not even statistically representative samples of the data. The plural of anecdote, is not data. It's a pointless debate.
Back to the OP .. the OP's "certificate" ( or transcription ) only lists the town. This admits to two possibilities
(a) That's all that was recorded
in her particular case ; or
(b) The full address was recorded, and the OP feels that she has not "got what she paid for" .
Several pages back, the OP seemed to be expressing (b), quite strongly. It's only my opinion, and based on my observations, but I think that (a) is also quite likely. You have a different opinion.
If the OP realises that (a) is quite possible, she may feel less bitter than someone has cheated her, and she may also waste less time and effort on a pointless search for the elusive "full" certificate which may be hidden out there somewhere.
Even rigourous statistical analysis is not going to help the OP with information about the facts and perceived omissions on her own particular specific certificate.