Reading that last quoted Indenture for William and Thomas Davies, they use the term. "fine" in the second indenture. I think that the term can be taken as, "cancelled" and this throws some light on the indenture that shows a fine being levied on Elizabeth Richards, Widow, etc.
Quoting my post from 3 Dec.
[Further careful reading of other docs show that she is a widow in 1762 as per the Indent' that shows the 'fine', along with Elizabeth Richards, widow.]
The "fine" refers to an original agreement made between the parties in 1762 but is cancelled in the 1770s. I think that the Elizabeth Richards shown in that indent' is the mother of John and James et al, and that she is shown as a widow by the 1770s but wasn't one in 1762 ... ditto may apply to Leticia, the wife of David of Ffos, also shown as widow.
This interpretation of the indent' explains why Elizabeth, although shown as a widow in 1762, has another child, James, in 1763. (I have a photo of his grave that confirms his date of birth).
One simply worded indent' helps to interpret the more complex. I wonder what else we've missed on the way.
Regards, Peter.