Author Topic: One word from a Sasine 1751  (Read 1452 times)

Offline goldie61

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,900
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: One word from a Sasine 1751
« Reply #9 on: Monday 04 August 14 22:56 BST (UK) »
I cannot find one capital ‘p’ in the two sasines I have, which I know  were written by the same person (they run consecutively in the register and were written an hour after each other). Even ‘important’ words like ‘notary public’ (neither word have a capital letter), or ‘precept of sasine’ (no capitals)

Capital letters are not necessarily used even for people’s names or place names.

He does, however, use a lot of  capital ‘d’s, and not only for ‘important’ words.
In fact I think every word that starts with a ‘d’ is written with a capital.

As to grammar, surely if the verb ‘presume’ were to be used, in this case it would be the present tense ‘presume’ and not the past tense ‘presumed’?
Although the spelling is a little random in places, his grammar seems fairly sound to me.

The piece reads – I’ve put in where the capital letters are – and aren’t.

and in Regard the sd michael Cochrane his Children a former marriage it is yrby provided and Declared that in Case these Children  ? ? to his half of the sd lands of meadowfoot and the heir of this present marriage be yrby excluded yrof that then and in Case the said margaret Hamilton marrying again to a second husband she yrby forfaults looses and tines the Benefit of the whole Liferent provided to her in manner aforesd ‘

You would think ‘provided and declared’ would warrant the same treatment here – whether both capitals, or both lower case, but the ‘p’ of ‘provided’ is lower case, and the ‘d’ of ‘declared’ a capital.

Thanks Philip
Lane, Burgess: Cheshire. Finney, Rogers, Gilman:Derbys
Cochran, Nicol, Paton, Bruce:Scotland. Bertolle:London
Bainbridge, Christman, Jeffs: Staffs

Offline veeblevort

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,341
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: One word from a Sasine 1751
« Reply #10 on: Tuesday 05 August 14 17:21 BST (UK) »
The logic behind capitalisation in documents of this age tends to
defeat the modern reader, probably because there is no logic.  ???

My first reading was "Doe Succeed", although on more careful
examination, there is a letter missing from the second word. Whether
it is a "c" or an e", I can't tell. Enlargement doesn't help due to the
image quality.

vv.

Offline goldie61

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,900
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: One word from a Sasine 1751
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday 06 August 14 22:44 BST (UK) »
I agree there is a missing letter in 'succeed' - a second 'c' I'd say.
Along with his capitalisation of odd words, his spelling is also a little random to our eyes.
I have seen 'ricieve' (receive), 'discribed' (described), 'breadeth' breadth, not to mention 'publick', and doubling of consonants where we wouldn't and only one where we would!
So I don't think I'm too worried about only one 'c' in succeed.

Sorry about the image - the writing was so minute it doesn't matter what you do, it really doesn't get very clear by the time it's blown up a lot.

Thanks vv
Lane, Burgess: Cheshire. Finney, Rogers, Gilman:Derbys
Cochran, Nicol, Paton, Bruce:Scotland. Bertolle:London
Bainbridge, Christman, Jeffs: Staffs