Right, that does it …. My rellies can make the phone calls to NSW BDM to sort this one out. (For my non RChat rellies reading this thread …. It’s the 1897 marriages for the parents of Uncle Bert’s and for the parents of Auntie Dottie’s )
Civil Registration MARRIAGES …. Two lads who were brothers married. The two lasses they married were sisters. And there was a DOUBLE marriage ceremony. So, surnames for the two lads are identical, but there’s different given names. And of course, surnames for the two lasses are identical, but different given names.... And the marriage reference numbers from the paper copy of NSW BDM registrations are consecutive… and the DISTRICT used to be displayed.... So Previously the search option would find BOTH just by using the lads’ surname and the lasses’ surname and the district, and limiting the search to the year.
NOW, this new search option requires the given name ….. so I need to conduct TWO separate searches to find the two marriages. WHAT IF I was not aware of the double ceremony? What if I did not know the formal order of the given names for either of the lads or of the lasses ...
Fingers crossed I will get used to these differences, and fingers crossed some of the younger set who are taking up family history will not be put off by these possible difficulties.
Cheers, JM (logging off, as I do have a real TO DO list to get through today .... full of nought to do with family history searchings )