Author Topic: BMD's after 1958 Frustration  (Read 3335 times)

Offline Cog

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: BMD's after 1958 Frustration
« Reply #9 on: Monday 16 June 14 00:09 BST (UK) »
didnt know that Loudam ...but if we had date of BDM eh ? hope its soon ...

Carol
O'GRADY - DUBLIN,TIPPERARY,& ENGLAND
DOOLEY - TIPPERARY, CO LAOIS
KAVANAGH - DUBLIN
HARRIS- CLARE, CORK, & ENGLAND
BLANEY, DOYLE FURLONG -  WEXFORD
FURLONG-WEXFORD
MELICAN- CLARE

OTHER NAME INTERESTS - MORAN ,CORBETT, LILLIS, MCGERRY, MCNAMARA, MCGRANE, BRENNAN.....All County Clare & Scattery Island

Offline conahy calling

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,487
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: BMD's after 1958 Frustration
« Reply #10 on: Monday 16 June 14 11:51 BST (UK) »
May be of use to you
Wills and Testamentary Records,National Archives Ireland. found by googling same.
Gives will extracts and other Government references up to fairly recent times.

http://www.nationalarchives.ie/genealogy1/genealogy-records/wills-testamentary-records/

This is the link which refers

Offline Cog

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: BMD's after 1958 Frustration
« Reply #11 on: Monday 16 June 14 19:15 BST (UK) »
Thankyou Conahay I have used this before and found it very useful in searches.  :)

Carol
O'GRADY - DUBLIN,TIPPERARY,& ENGLAND
DOOLEY - TIPPERARY, CO LAOIS
KAVANAGH - DUBLIN
HARRIS- CLARE, CORK, & ENGLAND
BLANEY, DOYLE FURLONG -  WEXFORD
FURLONG-WEXFORD
MELICAN- CLARE

OTHER NAME INTERESTS - MORAN ,CORBETT, LILLIS, MCGERRY, MCNAMARA, MCGRANE, BRENNAN.....All County Clare & Scattery Island

Offline KGarrad

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,918
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: BMD's after 1958 Frustration
« Reply #12 on: Tuesday 17 June 14 10:08 BST (UK) »
Hey  :D

thanks for replies , it just seems so frustrating that again Ireland are so far behind the rest of the world with online sources ...its coming up to 60 years ! I realise there would have to be a period where for privacy a cut off period would be put in place ...but 56 years !! I think they have their reasons to hold back on people being able to trace others that may be alive but this wouldnt stop anyone as they are public records , but for people that cannot get to Ireland its massively frustrating . Thanks for the links , and I think I may be getting quite a few people to send emails asking for the same to be released .

Carol

Compared with, for example, Australia?

Quoting from another thread:

May I gently mention that Civil registration for births, deaths and marriages are the responsibilities of each of the states and territories that make up the Federation of the Commonwealth of Australia.  And in Australia, the information on BDMs is PRIVATE information, and therefore access to the non historic BDM registrations by members of the general public is restricted.  (Unlike say quite recent English BDMs which seem to be readily available to members of the general public)

Our OP notes that George and his three children migrated to Queensland in the 1930s, where he re-married and had a further child.  So may I note that in Queensland the BDM restrictions are 100 years for births, 30 years for deaths, 75 years for marriages.   
https://www.qld.gov.au/law/births-deaths-marriages-and-divorces/family-history-research/information-and-how-to-access-and-order-records/information-you-can-access/

http://www.justice.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/58341/Certificate-Access-Policy.pdf 


Forgot to add: this is a quote from MAJM, a NSW expert!
Garrad (Suffolk, Essex, Somerset), Crocker (Somerset), Vanstone (Devon, Jersey), Sims (Wiltshire), Bridger (Kent)


Offline majm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,385
  • NSW 1806 Bowman Flag Ecce signum.
    • View Profile
Re: BMD's after 1958 Frustration
« Reply #13 on: Tuesday 17 June 14 10:33 BST (UK) »
There's a great deal of PRIVATE information on the various BDM certificates for each of the different states and territories that form the Federation of the Commonwealth of Australia.   For example, my own birth certificate contains detailed information about each of my parents, each of my older siblings, the employer's details for each of my parents, the full names of my both my parents, including former names, full street addresses, names and qualifications of the medico and staff assisting, and a great deal more.    Same amount of depth for each and every one of my NSW born ancestors who were born AFTER March 1856.   Most of the Australian states and territories have similar depth of info. 

This (long standing restricted access policy) means that from a family history perspective, we do not conduct our family history research in the same way that someone researching 20th century families in say England would research.

As an aside, may I mention that the quote that KGarrad has highlighted, comes from a current thread, and he is quoting from my post on that thread, although he has not yet acknowledged my post  ::) on that thread  ::)

 
Compared with, for example, Australia?

Quoting from another thread:

May I gently mention that Civil registration for births, deaths and marriages are the responsibilities of each of the states and territories that make up the Federation of the Commonwealth of Australia.  And in Australia, the information on BDMs is PRIVATE information, and therefore access to the non historic BDM registrations by members of the general public is restricted.  (Unlike say quite recent English BDMs which seem to be readily available to members of the general public)

Our OP notes that George and his three children migrated to Queensland in the 1930s, where he re-married and had a further child.  So may I note that in Queensland the BDM restrictions are 100 years for births, 30 years for deaths, 75 years for marriages.   
https://www.qld.gov.au/law/births-deaths-marriages-and-divorces/family-history-research/information-and-how-to-access-and-order-records/information-you-can-access/

http://www.justice.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/58341/Certificate-Access-Policy.pdf 

 

http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=690010.0

Cheers,  JM (NSW centric)

ADD, These restricted access limitations are not unique to the eight jurisdictions that make up Australia .... New Zealand also has restricted access, and I understand that many of the states in the US of A do too.   
The information in my posts is provided for academic and non-commercial research purposes. 
Random Acts of Kindness Given Freely are never Worthless for they are Priceless.
Qui scit et non docet.    Qui docet et non vivit.    Qui nescit et non interrogat.   
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
I do not have a face book or a twitter account.

Offline HugoBeauchamp

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
    • View Profile
Re: BMD's after 1958 Frustration
« Reply #14 on: Monday 23 June 14 21:22 BST (UK) »
For anyone who's missed it look at Claire Santry's  Irish Genealogy News http://irish-genealogy-news.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/major-news-enhanced-gro-indexes-launch.html.

H
Drogheda, Co Louth - Magee/McGee
Dublin City - Brady, Magee/McGee, McNally, Sheridan, Taylor
Mitchelstown, Co Cork - Hyland, Martin, Russell
Ballyporeen, Co Tipperary - Russell