James R W Betteridge 1908

[Jaime2013]

in 1911 they had 7 kids and 1 died. they have 5 living with them. so there is 2 uncounted for.

[Jaime2013]

i found out that arthur betteridge born in 1895 middle name is william not wilson

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/2F3D-LLJ

[Jaime2013]

also this annie has no elizabeth in her name she is just Annie Wilson Betteridge

[Jaime2013]

and ive just worked out if there son died in 1918 he wudnt be marked as died in 1911. so another one of their kids died IF Arthur Wilson (1895) is related

[keyboard86]

also this annie has no elizabeth in her name she is just Annie Wilson Betteridge

OK taking your thoughts to its logical end, the Emma with her in 1901 is therefore not the one on 1911. is that correct, and the Silman family living with them are no relation to the Annie Silman who married in 1902 or 1894?

Keyboard86

[Jaime2013]

emma was with her in 1901(age 1) and in 1911 (age 11).

i dont no anything to do with sillman family. ive just been working on the betteridge.

[Ladyhawk]

i found out that arthur betteridge born in 1895 middle name is william not wilson

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/2F3D-LLJ

England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 (from ancestry)
Arthur Wilson Betteridge
Date of Registration:   Jan-Feb-Mar 1895
Registration district:   Middlesbrough
Inferred County:   Yorkshire North Riding
Volume:   9d Page:   618

have checked the type written entry and middle name it reads WILSON not William
   

[Jaime2013]

on a past post it says in 1901 annie is head of house aged 25 (so where is arthur-dad). there is a minnie silman 15 which is her sister so it does look like she is nee silman.

[Jaime2013]

its puzzling me where the wilson come from. was she married before?