Aww come on... you can't set the dogs loose then give up

Don't read too much into our chatroom banter. But you should really put in everything you know when you post a question. just saves going over old ground. My apologies if I put you off

.
This is one of the more interesting threads that has been on for a while

The Mormon link says lots to me, could be wrong, but I don't think anyone was going to inherit a Baronetcy from the British Throne if they were a Mormon. It may explain the very late registrations and marriage in 1939. Could be wrong though, more often than not I am.

Some seem to have strayed from the righteous path, but thats no nevermind, interesting lot in all. There is nothing to say that the church record is correct it may have been given in absentia? Sounds to me like someone was attempting to arrest a soul in decay
I don't believe your Lily died 1935 but was at home duties at Scarborough in 1958 as per Cando's post.
Just my thoughts.
Neil
