Author Topic: The new FindMyPast (Part 4)  (Read 32088 times)

Offline Parmesan

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,893
  • Dad 1921-2015
    • View Profile
Re: The new FindMyPast (Part 4)
« Reply #135 on: Saturday 17 May 14 11:19 BST (UK) »

They're better quality scans than those on ancestry too.  I had a copy of my grandfather's pension records that somebody printed off for me at the National Archives which was quite feint.  The copy on ancestry isn't that good either but I looked at it on FindMyPast last night and it's much better.  I don't think they can be scans of the microfilms. ;D

Somebody else made this comment but I find Ancestry's much cleaner.
Paternal: Staffordshire, Shropshire, Lancashire, Cheshire, Durham, Wales, Arrondissements Oudenaarde and Gent, Belgium, -  - Maternal: Cheshire, Lancashire, Ireland

Offline lisalisa

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 621
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The new FindMyPast (Part 4)
« Reply #136 on: Tuesday 20 May 14 16:25 BST (UK) »
The electoral registers are something else that is pointless to use now.

It seems you have to know the answer - ie where they live - to be able to find anyone.

On the search you can no longer put in the name of anyone else in the house - I remember being able to put the spouse's first name, maybe as a keyword, but it narrowed down the search results considerably.

If you do find someone and look, the 'result transcript' tells you 'length of occupancy', but not which years, so that is pretty useless for finding where someone lives now. 

I find better results just googling and looking at 192 for free.

I have no idea if this is on their 'to do' list.

On another note the search results on bmds etc being in alphabetical order by name is so annoying and time wasting.  Surely the default should be date order as if you were reading the register in question.
I know you can reset the order, but it would be better if it were done 'properly' in the first place.

Lisa



Offline dawnsh

  • Global Moderator
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 15,546
    • View Profile
Re: The new FindMyPast (Part 4)
« Reply #137 on: Tuesday 20 May 14 17:14 BST (UK) »
The GRO bmd indexes are in alphabetical name order, the only thing FindMyPast doesn't do is put them in order quarter by quarter but their results have never been displayed showing the quarters.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Sherry-Paddington & Marylebone,
Longhurst-Ealing & Capel, Abinger, Ewhurst & Ockley,
Chandler-Chelsea

Offline Parmesan

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,893
  • Dad 1921-2015
    • View Profile
Re: The new FindMyPast (Part 4)
« Reply #138 on: Tuesday 20 May 14 17:35 BST (UK) »
Newspaper downloading is functioning again
Paternal: Staffordshire, Shropshire, Lancashire, Cheshire, Durham, Wales, Arrondissements Oudenaarde and Gent, Belgium, -  - Maternal: Cheshire, Lancashire, Ireland


Offline Treetotal

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 28,500
    • View Profile
Re: The new FindMyPast (Part 4)
« Reply #139 on: Tuesday 20 May 14 17:55 BST (UK) »
Not on mine it's not...the download button is back but when I download the page..it's blank  ???
Carol
CAPES Hull. KIRK  Leeds, Hull. JONES  Wales,  Lancashire. CARROLL Ireland, Lancashire, U.S.A. BROUGHTON Leicester, Goole, Hull BORRILL  Lincolnshire, Durham, Hull. GROOM  Wishbech, Hull. ANTHONY St. John's Nfld. BUCKNALL Lincolnshire, Hull. BUTT Harbour Grace, Newfoundland. PARSONS  Western Bay, Newfoundland. MONAGHAN  Ireland, U.S.A. PERRY Cheshire, Liverpool.
 
RESTORERS:PLEASE DO NOT USE MY RESTORES WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION - THANK YOU

Offline smudwhisk

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,864
  • Whiskey (1997-2018)
    • View Profile
Re: The new FindMyPast (Part 4)
« Reply #140 on: Tuesday 20 May 14 19:26 BST (UK) »
On the search you can no longer put in the name of anyone else in the house - I remember being able to put the spouse's first name, maybe as a keyword, but it narrowed down the search results considerably.

The years of occupancy shows on the results page, you just have to remember it when viewing the entry. :-\  OK, not as good as previously but it is there.
(KENT) Lingwell, Rayment (BUCKS) Read, Hutchins (SRY) Costin, Westbrook (DOR) Gibbs, Goreing (DUR) Green (ESX) Rudland, Malden, Rouse, Boosey (FIFE) Foulis, Russell (NFK) Johnson, Farthing, Purdy, Barsham (GLOS) Collett, Morris, Freebury, May, Kirkman (HERTS) Winchester, Linford (NORTHANTS) Bird, Brimley, Chater, Wilford, Read, Chapman, Jeys, Marston, Lumley (WILTS) Arden, Whatley, Batson, Gleed, Greenhill (SOM) Coombs, Watkins (RUT) Stafford (BERKS) Sansom, Angel, Young, Stratton, Weeks, Day

Offline lisalisa

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 621
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The new FindMyPast (Part 4)
« Reply #141 on: Tuesday 20 May 14 22:28 BST (UK) »
On the search you can no longer put in the name of anyone else in the house - I remember being able to put the spouse's first name, maybe as a keyword, but it narrowed down the search results considerably.

The years of occupancy shows on the results page, you just have to remember it when viewing the entry. :-\  OK, not as good as previously but it is there.

I don't see any dates on the results page - the headings are as follows
first name - last name -town - county -country -collection from - where (this repeats town, county, country)

Then if I view the transcription
name, address, occupancy years - 2
etc

but it doesn't tell me which 2 years that is out of 2002-2013.

It sounds like the results page you see is different.
I'm not seeing any dates on the list of results.   :-\

Lisa

Offline Parmesan

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,893
  • Dad 1921-2015
    • View Profile
Re: The new FindMyPast (Part 4)
« Reply #142 on: Tuesday 20 May 14 22:39 BST (UK) »
On the search you can no longer put in the name of anyone else in the house - I remember being able to put the spouse's first name, maybe as a keyword, but it narrowed down the search results considerably.



Lisa

You can, IF you choose the right route to search. There are severa.
Paternal: Staffordshire, Shropshire, Lancashire, Cheshire, Durham, Wales, Arrondissements Oudenaarde and Gent, Belgium, -  - Maternal: Cheshire, Lancashire, Ireland

Offline lisalisa

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 621
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The new FindMyPast (Part 4)
« Reply #143 on: Tuesday 20 May 14 22:46 BST (UK) »
The GRO bmd indexes are in alphabetical name order, the only thing FindMyPast doesn't do is put them in order quarter by quarter but their results have never been displayed showing the quarters.

I'm talking about the order in which the search results are appearing - if  the name is the same in each result, the results do come up in chronological date order (as far as I can see and until a middle name initial appears).

However if a search is done using a last name and a mother's maiden name, but no first name - ie to find out children born - this results in the first names being different each time and those names are appearing in alphabetical order.
Even if I specify a date - eg 1959 +/- 10 years - the results by default appear according to alphabetical order of the first names. 
I have to change the relevance to birth year to get the results in date order.

I think if you read through the GRO bmd indexes, you will find they are also compiled in date order - year, then quarter and then within those time frames in alphabetical order by surname (first).

Lisa