« Reply #157 on: Friday 28 March 14 17:37 GMT (UK) »
I think there are quite a few cases where you select a record set and you get results from other record sets after a search.
It's quite funny really in light of all the complaints about ancestry new search, but if you search a single data set on ancestry, you still get results from just that data set. For once ancestry currently wins on that.

There appears to be no involvement of those who were going to be using this site to get their views before they produced such an unfriendly search engine.
I believe they are claiming a 1,000 subscribers test run the new website and provided positive feedback. However, I've not seen any comments from anyone suggesting they were one of these people which does make you think FindMyPast are just trying to justify the change anyway possible.

(KENT) Lingwell, Rayment (BUCKS) Read, Hutchins (SRY) Costin, Westbrook (DOR) Gibbs, Goreing (DUR) Green (ESX) Rudland, Malden, Rouse, Boosey (FIFE) Foulis, Russell (NFK) Johnson, Farthing, Purdy, Barsham (GLOS) Collett, Morris, Freebury, May, Kirkman (HERTS) Winchester, Linford (NORTHANTS) Bird, Brimley, Chater, Wilford, Read, Chapman, Jeys, Marston, Lumley (WILTS) Arden, Whatley, Batson, Gleed, Greenhill (SOM) Coombs, Watkins (RUT) Stafford (BERKS) Sansom, Angel, Young, Stratton, Weeks, Day