Author Topic: The new Findmypast (Part 1)  (Read 51517 times)

Offline LizzieW

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,031
  • I'm nearer to finding out who you are thanks DNA
    • View Profile
Re: The new Findmypast
« Reply #153 on: Friday 28 March 14 15:12 GMT (UK) »
I've been on Facebook to see all the complaints on there, and amidst them all I found a hint of a better way to search.

Click on Search Records and at the bottom of the list is List All UK Records.  Click on that and you get a page with lost of different headings, Birth, Marriage, Death and parish records is one heading and under that are listed Births and Baptisms, Churches and Religion, Deaths and Burials, Marriages, Parish Record Browse and Wills and Probate.  Mind you, when I searched under Wills and Probate for my 2 x g.grandmother's will (which I knew was on FindMyPast) the results brought up not only the will but also the 1851 and 1861 census.  Not sure why, or why it didn't show the 1841 census.

Try it and see what you think - not as good as the old FindMyPast though but unless they revert to the old site, this is how I'll search until my sub runs out in October.  I've already unticked auto renew so they can't just take money for a new sub.

Lizzie

Offline 2mm

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 160
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The new Findmypast
« Reply #154 on: Friday 28 March 14 15:18 GMT (UK) »
Hello All
I emailed FindMyPast yesterday morning regarding how to delete unwanted " My Records "  :'( :'( :'(
Will let you know outcome.

omega

one at a time always took for ever, just left them to long,  so why can't we have at end of each  full saved page" little boxes next to entry with the old  X " , with 1 option at bottom of page delete all old kisses not wanted, or words to that effect.
Do this with my unwanted e mails, its soooooooooooo  easy, perhaps that's why F M P wouldn't even consider it
2mm

Offline Hampshire Lass

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,359
    • View Profile
Re: The new Findmypast
« Reply #155 on: Friday 28 March 14 15:32 GMT (UK) »
I've been on Facebook to see all the complaints on there, and amidst them all I found a hint of a better way to search.

Click on Search Records and at the bottom of the list is List All UK Records.  Click on that and you get a page with lost of different headings, Birth, Marriage, Death and parish records is one heading and under that are listed Births and Baptisms, Churches and Religion, Deaths and Burials, Marriages, Parish Record Browse and Wills and Probate.  Mind you, when I searched under Wills and Probate for my 2 x g.grandmother's will (which I knew was on FindMyPast) the results brought up not only the will but also the 1851 and 1861 census.  Not sure why, or why it didn't show the 1841 census.

Try it and see what you think - not as good as the old FindMyPast though but unless they revert to the old site, this is how I'll search

Lizzie

That's a brilliant tip Lizzie.....thank you so much ;D
Best wishes HL


Census information is crown copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline locksmith

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
    • View Profile
Re: The new Findmypast
« Reply #156 on: Friday 28 March 14 15:42 GMT (UK) »
Lizzie

I think there are quite a few cases where you select a record set and you get results from other record sets after a search. This is really a case that thzey have released the new site before it has been properly tested. If I were to release software like this at work, without proper testing, I wouldn't last long in the job. There appears to be no involvement of those who were going to be using this site to get their views before they produced such an unfriendly search engine.

Simon


Offline smudwhisk

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,865
  • Whiskey (1997-2018)
    • View Profile
Re: The new Findmypast
« Reply #157 on: Friday 28 March 14 17:37 GMT (UK) »
I think there are quite a few cases where you select a record set and you get results from other record sets after a search.

It's quite funny really in light of all the complaints about ancestry new search, but if you search a single data set on ancestry, you still get results from just that data set.  For once ancestry currently wins on that. ;)

There appears to be no involvement of those who were going to be using this site to get their views before they produced such an unfriendly search engine.

I believe they are claiming a 1,000 subscribers test run the new website and provided positive feedback.  However, I've not seen any comments from anyone suggesting they were one of these people which does make you think FindMyPast are just trying to justify the change anyway possible. :-\
(KENT) Lingwell, Rayment (BUCKS) Read, Hutchins (SRY) Costin, Westbrook (DOR) Gibbs, Goreing (DUR) Green (ESX) Rudland, Malden, Rouse, Boosey (FIFE) Foulis, Russell (NFK) Johnson, Farthing, Purdy, Barsham (GLOS) Collett, Morris, Freebury, May, Kirkman (HERTS) Winchester, Linford (NORTHANTS) Bird, Brimley, Chater, Wilford, Read, Chapman, Jeys, Marston, Lumley (WILTS) Arden, Whatley, Batson, Gleed, Greenhill (SOM) Coombs, Watkins (RUT) Stafford (BERKS) Sansom, Angel, Young, Stratton, Weeks, Day

Offline LizzieW

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,031
  • I'm nearer to finding out who you are thanks DNA
    • View Profile
Re: The new Findmypast
« Reply #158 on: Friday 28 March 14 17:37 GMT (UK) »
Hampshire Lass - Glad to be of service, it wasn't my tip but I thought it worth passing on.

Lizzie

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,694
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: The new Findmypast
« Reply #159 on: Friday 28 March 14 17:57 GMT (UK) »
I don't understand  :-\

If I just enter the surname Archbell (no other information at all) from the home page, then I get a number of results - OK it's an unusual surname  :o - and the categories are shown in the filters when the results appear. ;D  However, if I then chose the filter from the list, I only get those results.  And if I change the filter parameters, then I get different results.  And even more importantly from my point of view I only get English results.  What more do you want?  Or have I lost the plot completely  :-X
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline smudwhisk

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,865
  • Whiskey (1997-2018)
    • View Profile
Re: The new Findmypast
« Reply #160 on: Friday 28 March 14 19:12 GMT (UK) »
Perhaps the FindMyPast filters are working for some people properly but not others?
(KENT) Lingwell, Rayment (BUCKS) Read, Hutchins (SRY) Costin, Westbrook (DOR) Gibbs, Goreing (DUR) Green (ESX) Rudland, Malden, Rouse, Boosey (FIFE) Foulis, Russell (NFK) Johnson, Farthing, Purdy, Barsham (GLOS) Collett, Morris, Freebury, May, Kirkman (HERTS) Winchester, Linford (NORTHANTS) Bird, Brimley, Chater, Wilford, Read, Chapman, Jeys, Marston, Lumley (WILTS) Arden, Whatley, Batson, Gleed, Greenhill (SOM) Coombs, Watkins (RUT) Stafford (BERKS) Sansom, Angel, Young, Stratton, Weeks, Day

Offline locksmith

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
    • View Profile
Re: The new Findmypast
« Reply #161 on: Friday 28 March 14 20:21 GMT (UK) »
Or have I lost the plot completely  :-X

Not at all BumbleB.
The problems are not with the general search forms where you reduce your 'hits' by applying more filters on successive searches which is where you have the results that you expect. The problems are with the individual search forms that you get to by selecting 'all search records' and subsequently the specific search set. eg If I select 'all search records' then 'births and baptisms' then the 'Parish marriages 1538-2005' set, put a name in to search, it brings up results from all sorts of sets (rate books, deaths and burial, censuses etc), clearly a fault in the system. If you look at the marriage record collection for instance, it lists sets for burials and baptisms and is a bit of a mess and shouldn't have been unleashed on the subscribers in this state.

Simon