Author Topic: two marys daughters with1911 census same family ?  (Read 1656 times)

Offline oldhippyone

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,284
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
two marys daughters with1911 census same family ?
« on: Wednesday 12 February 14 08:36 GMT (UK) »
i have 2 mary mclachlan both born south shields   in 1911 census both daughters of robert and sarah one born 1901 the other 1911 was it normal to have 2 daughters with same name ?

Offline lizdb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,307
    • View Profile
Re: two marys daughters with1911 census same family ?
« Reply #1 on: Wednesday 12 February 14 08:43 GMT (UK) »
I wouldnt say it was 'normal' but it has been known!

Are you sure they are both children of the couple though? More often than not when this sort of scenario comes up, it is because it is a second marriage for them both, and they both already had a daughter called Mary from their first marriages.
Edmonds/Edmunds - mainly Sussex
DeBoo - London
Green - Suffolk
Parker - Sussex
Kemp - Essex
Farrington - Essex
Boniface - West Sussex

census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,745
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: two marys daughters with1911 census same family ?
« Reply #2 on: Wednesday 12 February 14 08:47 GMT (UK) »
From the information given in the census return, I don't think there have been two marriages  :-\

There are two registrations in South Shields Registration District to match:

Mary Elizabeth McLachlan registered March quarter 1901 and Mary A McLachlan in December quarter 1910, but there is no way of knowing, without purchasing the birth certificates, whether these are the two children concerned.
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline oldhippyone

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,284
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: two marys daughters with1911 census same family ?
« Reply #3 on: Wednesday 12 February 14 08:48 GMT (UK) »
robert married sarah in 1895 so mary 1901 must be theres and is on 1901 census with them


Offline oldhippyone

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,284
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: two marys daughters with1911 census same family ?
« Reply #4 on: Wednesday 12 February 14 08:49 GMT (UK) »
yes bumbbleb i have both the births , i find it strange

Online BumbleB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 14,745
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: two marys daughters with1911 census same family ?
« Reply #5 on: Wednesday 12 February 14 08:52 GMT (UK) »
Well, they do say that there's nowt so queer as folk  ;D  Robert and Sarah obviously just ran out of names to choose from!!
Transcriptions and NBI are merely finding aids.  They are NOT a substitute for original record entries.
Remember - "They'll be found when they want to be found" !!!
If you don't ask the question, you won't get an answer.
He/she who never made a mistake, never made anything.
Archbell - anywhere, any date
Kendall - WRY
Milner - WRY
Appleyard - WRY

Offline oldhippyone

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,284
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: two marys daughters with1911 census same family ?
« Reply #6 on: Wednesday 12 February 14 08:59 GMT (UK) »
there has to be another reason for them to have 2 mary,s

Offline dawnsh

  • Global Moderator
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 15,549
    • View Profile
Re: two marys daughters with1911 census same family ?
« Reply #7 on: Wednesday 12 February 14 09:06 GMT (UK) »
Mary Elizabeth might have been known as Elizabeth or Mary as she was the first one.

Is "Mary A" Mary Ann? she could have been known as MaryAnn, one name not 2.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Sherry-Paddington & Marylebone,
Longhurst-Ealing & Capel, Abinger, Ewhurst & Ockley,
Chandler-Chelsea

Offline lizdb

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 25,307
    • View Profile
Re: two marys daughters with1911 census same family ?
« Reply #8 on: Wednesday 12 February 14 09:08 GMT (UK) »
Why?    (Referring to post before last, red writing has come up when I went to send this post)

One thing we NEVER know when researching family history is WHY! ! !


I had a family who had two children called William. Their first son, William Henry appeared to always be known as Harry, I assumed  ( but will never actually know) it was to distinguish from Dad, also William.  Then many years and many children later, they called their yoingest William. I liked to think (and again I will never know) that as the first one was very much a Harry, they were determined to carry on the family name PROPERLY!

We can only guess the reasons why people in the past chose a particular name, it is fun to dream up stories as to the possible reasons, as long as we keep those stories separate in our minds from the facts we are trying to seek out in our research.  If the facts show they had two Marys, then so be it.
Edmonds/Edmunds - mainly Sussex
DeBoo - London
Green - Suffolk
Parker - Sussex
Kemp - Essex
Farrington - Essex
Boniface - West Sussex

census information is Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk