Another Visit to East Sussex Record Office

[Chris in 1066Land]

mnmilt

Hi again Mark

Burials in Hailsham Parish Registers for Surname Crowhurst and Variant between 1700 and 1800 - in date order

1700 April 15, Richard
1701 Jan 6th, Katherine, Widow
1704 Dec 29th, Eliz
1708 Sept 30th, Benjamin, son of George
1721 Nov 3rd, Elizabeth, wife of George
1726 Mar 7th, Lucy, dau of Thomas
1729 Mar 26th, Thomas
1766 Mar 29th, Samuel, son of Samuel and Sarah
1768 May 30th, Samuel
1777 Sep 10th, Samuel of Sareland
1782 Mar 8th, George
1782 Jul 29th, Samuel, son of Thomas and Mary
1783 Aug 20th, John, son of Thomas and Mary
1786 Jul 28th, William, son of William and Sarah
1786 Sep 5th, Henry
1791 Dec 6th, James, Infant
1792 Oct 18th, Samuel
1794 Mar 17th, Mary
1794 May 25th, Elizabeth, dau of William and Mary

Burials in Hailsham Parish Registers for Surname Roads and Variant between 1700 and 1800 - in date order

NILL

End of Part 3

That is all the information that I could find - hope it meets with your satisfaction

Chris in 1066

[debbi2k]

Dear Chris,

thank you for looking anyway.Sorry to have wasted your time

Will you be going again soon as I have another small request if you are.

Debbi

[cullen]

Chris,

Many thanks for your hard work, it is very much appreciated.

Kay

[Chris in 1066Land]

hi Debbie


thank you for looking anyway.Sorry to have wasted your time

Will you be going again soon as I have another small request if you are.

You were not wasting my time, sorry I could not find what you wanted

But Yes, I will be going again early September (after my holiday), so look forward to reading your request nearer that date

Chris in 1066

[debbi2k]

Dear Chris,

you are a star

Debbi

[~meg]

Hi Chris,
re: Sayers.  Thank you very much for looking.  I will keep the Sayers names that you did find on file - perhaps one day I will be able to make a connection.

Oh, and by the way, what's this "failed me once again" comment?  Never!

~meg

[Chris in 1066Land]

Hi ~meg

Oh, and by the way, what's this "failed me once again" comment?

It just seems that anything you require from a lookup, I usually come back with a negative response.

Is it 'Sods Law' or what?

Chris in 1066

[daz68]

Thanks VERY much Chris.

You have been very helpful in finding a couple of further brothers and sisters of George that I didn't know about and you have also opened up another avenue of enquiry for me in the Arlington area.  Once again many thanks for your the time and effort you have gone to.

Best regards.

Darren

Daz68

Hi Darren

I was hoping you might be able to help me fill in some details regarding the parents of my GGGG Grandfather George Stace who was christened on the 4 November 1804 in Heathfield, Sussex.  I know there names were George and Mary but not any of their BMD details.  Could you please check the Heathfield Parish records for their marriage details and potentially also for their birth details? 

Any help in uncovering another generation in my family history would be greatfully received.

I checked the Baptisms in Heathfield Register between 1751 and 1818 and found the following which is the only Stace family listed during this period.

Nov 4th 1804, George Stace, son of George & Mary
Apr 5th 1807, Mary Stace, dau of George & ?
Dec 20th 1807, Sophia Stace, dau of George & Mary (Aged 5 Years)
Mar 15th 1812, Susanna Stace, dau of George & Mary
May 19th 1816, Martha Stace, dau of George & Mary, Labourer
Jul 26th 1818, Sarah Stace, dau of George & Mary, Labourer

There were no marriages of a Stace in Heathfield between 1780 and 1812

but there was this in Arlington and according to the sussex marriage index is the only George Stace marrying a Mary during this period

Location: Arlington, East Sussex,  Date: 24 Mar 1796:
Groom: George STACE, of this parish
Bride: Mary ALLCHIN, West Firle
Married by Licence

I had a look in the Burial Registers to see if Stace was a common name in Heathfield - only four entries in 60 years between 1754 and 1813

25th Jan 1774 - John Stace was buried
24th Jul 1764 - Thomas
14th July 1763 - Mary, wife of Thomas
3rd Dec 1754 - Mary, wife of John

Its my opinion that George and Mary married elsewhere and moved to heathfield where they possibly had relations and had the rest of their children there.
Possibly a look in the Arlington register for earlier children might throw a bit more light on this

Hope the above is usefull

Chris in 1066

 
 

[~meg]

Sod’s Law?  No, more like Howe’s Law, I think: “Every man has a scheme which will not work.”!  It’s me.  I’m going to have to change my scheme obviously!  I’ll work on it over the summer and have one ready for your visit in September.

Have a wonderful holiday,

~meg