Father of Thomas Smith born Hanslope, Northamptonshire, England

[seahall]

Morning All. 

I meant to say save a copy not purchase from Anc****. 

flateric999 there are 2 links to the Hanslope web site here is one again.
http://www.rootschat.com/links/0f8l/
the other was kindly noted by claire on Reply 3 of this thread.

In case of assistance for others who maybe following this topic.
 
Sandy

[mgeneas]

Is this your family living in Tamworth, Staffordshire in 1881?

Joseph SMITH age 38 born Wicken, Northants
Louisa SMITH age 38
Herbert A. age 12
Julia Lizzie age 8
Elizabeth Annie age 8
Evelyn B

[:sjl]

Hi:

just to let you know I got the results back today for the request for all SMITHS from 1760 to 1860 baptised in the county of Buckinghamshire.

definitely got my monies worth.

there are 111 pages worth of info.

*****************

just keeping you informed.

:sjl

[:sjl]

Re: Father of Thomas Smith born Hanslope, Northamptonshire, England
« Reply #37 on: Today at 17:18 »
Quote
Is this your family living in Tamworth, Staffordshire in 1881?

Joseph SMITH age 38 born Wicken, Northants
Louisa SMITH age 38
Herbert A. age 12  Herbert Archibald
Julia Lizzie age 8
Elizabeth Annie age 8
Evelyn B


yes, that is the correct family.

:sjl

[mgeneas]

Glad I have indentified the right family - I was beginning to lose the plot and needed a reliable starting point!

In your baptisms printout will you please keep an eye open for any children of a John and Margaret SMITH - likely before 1800
They are my SMITH brickwall

[:sjl]

just going through the postings,

so do we, that is the royal we, need any info from the baptisms in Buckinghamshire?

if so, from WHAT area....sorry trying to sort through what you folks decided I needed is getting a little muddled .....in MY brain.....

anyone else need any info off the baptism list.....it is here so might as well use it.

Sharon

[:sjl]

Brilliant Nicola. 

The only way to confirm a person's lineage is as you say by buying the relevant
certificates.

Much better if you can purchase a copy on Anc**** or your local Library in
our case for 80p each against £9+ from the G.R.O.

Lets hope the rightful Thomas Smith is solved.

Another link for Bucks Marriages would be here, just search database.

http://www.rootschat.com/links/0lx0/

Sandy

is THIS the one you are referring to.....

sorry, double and triple checking that I am following the correct folks.

thanks

:sjl

1850   3   SMITH   Thomas   Potterspury   15   525       JONES   Hannah   30   Sep   1850   Passenham with Deanshanger - St Guthlac   107   NRO

[smudwhisk]

is THIS the one you are referring to.....

sorry, double and triple checking that I am following the correct folks.

thanks

:sjl

1850   3   SMITH   Thomas   Potterspury   15   525       JONES   Hannah   30   Sep   1850   Passenham with Deanshanger - St Guthlac   107   NRO

No, not unless you want to double check Marilyn's details as she's quoted this marriage on, I think, page 2 of this posting.

This is the one I'm suggesting:

I like the look of the Thornton/Tattenhoe family

There is a register office marriage of
Thomas   SMITH   of Whaddon, Bucks, labourer   Sarah   MITCHELL   of Wicken, widow   1847
Notice was given of the intended marriage at the Potterspury register office
(source a publication by the Eureka Partnership)

However, I can't find a marriage registered in 1847 for them at Potterspury, the nearest I can find is:

Thomas Smith
Sarah Mitchell
March qtr 1850
Winslow Registration District
6  485

There is an 1847 marriage of a Thomas Smith in Potterspury Registration District, but the only Sarah listed on the same reference is a Sarah Alcock.  It's possible that they didn't marry in 1847 but left it until 1850.

In light of that, and hoping it's not a Registry Office marriage as I doubt they'd be included, you may be best ordering marriage and burial searches from Bucks FHS for Smith and variants for the same period you ordered the baptisms.  With a bit of luck it may appear, if it doesn't you may have to order the above marriage certificate.

As for baptisms, you're interested in the Thornton and Whaddon Smiths, but again you could do with getting the marriage and burial searches for the same period to double check who married and who perhaps died young.

Nicola

[:sjl]

is THIS the one you are referring to.....

sorry, double and triple checking that I am following the correct folks.

thanks

:sjl

1850   3   SMITH   Thomas   Potterspury   15   525       JONES   Hannah   30   Sep   1850   Passenham with Deanshanger - St Guthlac   107   NRO

No, not unless you want to double check Marilyn's details as she's quoted this marriage on, I think, page 2 of this posting.

not trying to be hard to get along with but thought this is what you had suggested in your message 30..... which is where I was getting the info from

This is the one I'm suggesting:
in the same message 30....you stated ANOTHER OPTION  is the following
I like the look of the Thornton/Tattenhoe family

There is a register office marriage of
Thomas   SMITH   of Whaddon, Bucks, labourer   Sarah   MITCHELL   of Wicken, widow   1847
Notice was given of the intended marriage at the Potterspury register office
(source a publication by the Eureka Partnership)

You ALSO said that this was MOST LIKELY -  MY THOMAS' FATHER remarrying...

However, I can't find a marriage registered in 1847 for them at Potterspury, the nearest I can find is:

Thomas Smith
Sarah Mitchell
March qtr 1850
Winslow Registration District
6  485

There is an 1847 marriage of a Thomas Smith in Potterspury Registration District, but the only Sarah listed on the same reference is a Sarah Alcock.  It's possible that they didn't marry in 1847 but left it until 1850.

In light of that, and hoping it's not a Registry Office marriage as I doubt they'd be included, you may be best ordering marriage and burial searches from Bucks FHS for Smith and variants for the same period you ordered the baptisms.  With a bit of luck it may appear, if it doesn't you may have to order the above marriage certificate.

is it possible we are both getting confused.  again sorry to be such a pain, but no point in ordering the wrong thing....

:sjl