I didn't say the Mays weren't connected- just that you are possibly getting them muddled.
The Anne in my last post was Anne Russell and the Eliza from 1877 might be another child but that has nothing to do with Margaret.
Sorry I am just frustrated...
Eliza is also possible as Michael and Martha do not have any other children that I have found. So Michael could just be an Error?
Believe it or not I have gone through all the church records and married up all the May and Griffin families.
Susan, Martha, & David all have Richard and Martha as parents...
I have the Jane that you found with a Anne Griffin for a mother but Anne is probably an error.
I have two Richards one married to Martha Griffin and the other one to an Anne Griffin. I didn't think about the name Anne being an Error.
Thinking about it now how many Richard Mays could there be married at that time.
Not a lot I would think considering that there are non on the 1901 census for their age. If there were two you would think one of them would have lived.
Anne Russell I think R & M were just her godparents.