There was no Protestant church in Benbecula at the time so, unless the entry was nit-picking about him being conceived before Catherine married John Cameron, the baptism for Eoghan Og was wrongly entered. If you recall, Hugh Crawford died in August 1844, Catherine remarried in Feb 1849 and Hugh was born three or four months after that.
Hi Angus & Alexander,
I have had a look at the Uist Crawfords & my belief is that there has been an error somewhere along the line.
On 15 May
1849 baptised, Hugh Crawford born Iochdar to (Hugh, father deceased & Mrs Hugh Crawford)
On 18 Dec
1849 baptised Alexandrina Isabella Cameron born Creagorry Inn to John Cameron & Catherine Crawford or Cameron.
If Hugh was born to Catherine & John Cameron why would Hugh have been mentioned as the father and furthermore I doubt she could possibly have given birth to Alexanderina within the given timescale?
Was it a possibility that the Catherine Crawford married to John Cameron was in fact Hugh & Catherine's daughter?
Was it also a possibility that Hugh born to Hugh (deceased) was actually Hugh (Jnr's) child to his widow?.............bearing in mind that no forename or maiden surname was given for the mother of Hugh born to a deceased Hugh

Alexander has Mary, Catherine & Hugh (Jnr) by Hugh & Catherine born c1835 - c1845
" " Hugh (Snr) born c 1776
Therefore Hugh (Snr) would have been 59 yrs old at the time of the 1st birth, Mary!................

not impossible but it somehow seems improbable

I reckon the 3 kids births were a good bit prior to the circa dates mentioned

Any thoughts or otherwise, just trying to help

Anne Marie