In answer to your question which father’s name to use;
from a brief look at the family I think that I would accept the details recorded at Ellen’s marriage
unless you locate further information to the contrary.
My reasoning for this is that it is an official record and everything else requires proof.
What I discovered is listed below with links:
Marriage Record of Ellen BROPHY & William MURPHY; 1911shows her parents as Thomas BROPHY & Teresa CRIMMINS (transcribed as BRIMMER);
Ellen BROPHY in the MURPHY home on the 1911 censusAlthough her parents’ address was given as 19 Gordon Place;
they are not resident there on the census return
BROPHY Family on 1901 census at 11.7 Gordon’s PlaceThis looks like the
church marriage record in 1886 of Thomas BROPHY & Teresa CRIMMINS;
her name is transcribed as CUMMINS however it looks more like CRIMMINS to me,
if you examine the original. which would tie to the civil record shown by jnoone earlier.
I believe that the family were in the habit of using alternate given names throughout their lives
as the baptisms previously found with the mother Teresa Crimmins,
showed different father’s first names on each:
Baptism of Ellen BROPHY 1887 (F)John
Baptism of James Michael BROPHY 1889 (F) James
Baptism of Wiliam BROPHY 1891 (F)Thomas
However other records tie all these people, places and names together.
There are prison records referring to Teresa BROPHY in 1900 which would imply
that she was alive at that time
1900 in Mountjoy as Bessie O’BRIEN&
1900 as Teresa BROPHY which may be the same minor offence of drunk.
The address of Gordon’s Place links her to the family in 1901
and the birthplace of Mt. Pleasant Ave links her to the baptism records.
There is also a record of an
Ellen BROPHY in 1910;
birthplace Mountpleasant, residence Gordon’s Place, aged 22
which would tie the baptism with the father’s named John. She was also known as Teresa!
There are further records that I looked at on a paid site where
William BROPHY aged 21 in 1911 showed his mother Teresa of 19 Gordon Place as his next of kin;
Teresa BROPHY aged 43 also in 1911 showed T. Brophy as her husband and next of kin;
James BROPHY aged 25 in 1914 showed his mother Teresa of 21 Gordon Place as his next of kin.
James also applied unsuccessfully to join the Royal Dublin Fusiliers in 1914;
his file gives his next of kin as mother Theresa of 19 Gordon Place
and Bro. William of South Richmond Street.
There is no other family member mentioned i.e. Ellen or Thomas.
There is a
death of a Theresa BROPHY in 1918that fits with the correct age but not at any other time in Dublin
which could imply one of two things that
Teresa was listed as Mary in 1901
or that Thomas and Teresa just parted ways and he called a new partner, Mary, his wife on the 1901 census.
Hope that this helps rather than confuses but if you go though each records and compare the similarities you will see that most ties together and the purchase of a few civil records could confirm the details. – good luck!