Author Topic: uhm!!!! so does this mean our research is 'pointless'  (Read 5042 times)

Offline stevew101

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,388
  • Stotfold Boy
    • View Profile
Re: uhm!!!! so does this mean our research is 'pointless'
« Reply #9 on: Friday 16 August 13 09:39 BST (UK) »
I am thinking that I may need to buy some more software.  I am not sure if my database can hold so many children for one family.  Just in case!
**Please ask if you wish to modify my restores**    HFD Turner-Warwick-Gentle-Game-Harris-Howard-Clements-Gould-James-Lee-Cooper-Castle-Pallet-Hide-Barns-Watts-Swain-Shatbolt-Bonfield-Gundrill-Izard-Impy-Ellis-Carter-Honour BFD Gentle-Tansley-Bly-Rowney-Wilshire-Fisher-Tingay-Ivory-Clark SFK Jay-Norman-Ship ESX Jay-Mann-Gould-Fletcher MIDDX Roberts-Longe AUSTRALIA - Henry Gentle 1795-1865

Offline Guyana

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 134
  • How far back do you want to go?
    • View Profile
Re: uhm!!!! so does this mean our research is 'pointless'
« Reply #10 on: Friday 16 August 13 09:50 BST (UK) »
[Wonder what his occupation was noted as on his childrens birth certificates  ;D [children he had to his wife that is]
[/quote]He was a precision grinder.
CORDEN - N.Staffs/N.Warwicks
MORGAN - Tamworth/Notts
HIGGS - N. Warwicks
DEEMING - N.Warwicks
LEWIS - N.Warwicks

Offline tedscout

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 2,561
    • View Profile
Re: uhm!!!! so does this mean our research is 'pointless'
« Reply #11 on: Friday 16 August 13 09:54 BST (UK) »
Oh wow that is 15 children a year. That means if a baby was made each visit that is more than one visit a month.

I wonder if the visits were planned for an area to save money on travel. I.e "You have 4 ladies in London this week Derek  ;)

Did anyone think of STD's. I would have been concerned about that if I was his wife.

Leaves too many questions in my mind.  :o

Gadsby's, Farmers, Neals - Leicestershire
Freemans, Littles, Corbetts, Branns - Australia

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Maggie.

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,152
  • I haven't a clue about my Roots
    • View Profile
Re: uhm!!!! so does this mean our research is 'pointless'
« Reply #12 on: Friday 16 August 13 10:10 BST (UK) »
Rather a mind-boggling story  :o

Wars and their aftermath must always have resulted in some dodgy paternities but Derek's story is in another league!!

However, I shall continue to assume that my paternal line is as it purports to be as after all I do appear to look a bit like paternal grandfather  ;D

Maggie
Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Mike in Cumbria

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,776
    • View Profile
Re: uhm!!!! so does this mean our research is 'pointless'
« Reply #13 on: Friday 16 August 13 10:20 BST (UK) »
Being a father involves much more than providing a sperm at the right moment.

I would be much more interested in the man who brought up my ancestor, and the people who had shaped his life than in being able to trace a particular strand of DNA.

Mike

Offline Anni B

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
    • View Profile
Re: uhm!!!! so does this mean our research is 'pointless'
« Reply #14 on: Sunday 25 August 13 02:05 BST (UK) »
I'd take the whole story with a large pinch of salt, after all it seems to originate from the "Daily Mail".  Need I say more about that pernicious rag?
Anne

Offline brigidmac

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 6,490
  • Computer incompetent but stiil trying
    • View Profile
Re: uhm!!!! so does this mean our research is 'pointless'
« Reply #15 on: Sunday 27 October 24 07:48 GMT (UK) »
My mother had a match who had "sperm doner " written on their tree . I did contact someone else who matched them who said "oh yes my brother was a sperm doner in the 1970s and I get lots of people contacting me ! "
Roberts,Fellman.Macdermid smith jones,Bloch,Irvine,Hallis Stevenson

Offline coombs

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,929
  • Research the dead....forget the living.
    • View Profile
Re: uhm!!!! so does this mean our research is 'pointless'
« Reply #16 on: Sunday 27 October 24 12:25 GMT (UK) »
There was a time once when I did think that to be an ancestor of someone you have to actually be the blood ancestor, and biologically descended from them. But now I strongly refute that in cases where a man raised an ancestor from babyhood whether blood or not. The child took their surname and the man was married to the mother plus much more outside the sperm donor. Also you do not inherit DNA from every single blood ancestor anyway.

If a man married a pregnant woman and he knew the real father had fled or died and he was saving her from a sticky situation and raised the child as his own, then I would deffo count him as the child's father.
Researching:

LONDON, Coombs, Roberts, Auber, Helsdon, Fradine, Morin, Goodacre
DORSET Coombs, Munday
NORFOLK Helsdon, Riches, Harbord, Budery
KENT Roberts, Goodacre
SUSSEX Walder, Boniface, Dinnage, Standen, Lee, Botten, Wickham, Jupp
SUFFOLK Titshall, Frost, Fairweather, Mayhew, Archer, Eade, Scarfe
DURHAM Stewart, Musgrave, Wilson, Forster
SCOTLAND Stewart in Selkirk
USA Musgrave, Saix
ESSEX Cornwell, Stock, Quilter, Lawrence, Whale, Clift
OXON Edgington, Smith, Inkpen, Snell, Batten, Brain

Online martin hooper

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 342
    • View Profile
Re: uhm!!!! so does this mean our research is 'pointless'
« Reply #17 on: Sunday 27 October 24 13:58 GMT (UK) »
I'd take the whole story with a large pinch of salt, after all it seems to originate from the "Daily Mail".  Need I say more about that pernicious rag?
Anne

My thoughts exactly. Sounds like baloney to me.

Martin