The
Wicklow Newsletter, October 7th, 1865.
Correspondence.
Chemical and Smelting Works.
To the Editor of the Wicklow Newsletter:
Sir - Had "A Neighbour'' been better informed on the subject of his letter, in your last impression, he would have hesitated before, if not altogether refrained from, rushing into print regarding some matters on which it is evident he wants some enlightenment. He states that ''Lord Derby's Bill would be, no doubt (if possible to carry it into effect), of great service in
partially abating the nuisance; but when we see the great facility with which the laws are evaded, which profess to compel railways to burn coke, and manufacturers to consume their own smoke, one cannot hope that the Alkali Regulation Act will be enforced.''
It is a trite saying, but not the less true that ''one fact is worth a thousand arguments,'' and if ''A Neighbour'' will refer to the fourth section of that Act he will find that ''Every Alkali work shall be carried on in such a manner as to secure the condensation to the satisfaction of the Inspector, derived from his own examination, of not less than 95% of the muriatic acid evolved, under a penalty of, in the first conviction, not exceeding £50; and of every offence after, not exceeding £100.''
So much for the provisions; now for the results of the Act. Let him, therefore, further refer to the ''First Annual Report by the Government Inspector, Dr. Angus Smith, of the proceedings under the Act, during the year 1864,'' and he will find that ''the actual condensation, per cent., was 98.72; the average escape of acid, 1.28% over the
whole of the United Kingdom... That there was no conviction under the Act; no obstruction on the part of the Manufacturers;'' but on the contrary - that while it was believed that it would take two or three years to bring every work to a compliance with the demands of the Act, it was gratifying to be able to say that ''this result had been brought about in the first year, and no less pleasing to add that the success in many cases had been more complete than had been anticipated.'' Besides, Lord Derby, when commenting on that report in the House of Lords, on the 22nd of May last, declared that the facts therein detailed were ''remarkable and satisfactory'', and the result ''gratifying.''
From these facts, therefore, it must be obvious to anyone that ''A Neighbour'' has been somewhat hasty in his assumptions as to the inefficacy of the Act. But, if further proof is necessary, the projectors of the Works in question have the permission of Dr. Smith, as well as of Dr. Percy, Lecturer on Metallurgy, at the Royal School of Mines - the best authorities on the subject in the kingdom - for stating that by the patent processes which are to be adopted, ''the nuisance can be wholly suppressed.'' In fact, the sulphurous acid gas, instead of being evolved as at Swansea, will be too valuable to throw away; instead it will be fully utilized.
As to railways being compelled to burn coke, it will be found that there is no law to make them do so. They, or any manufacturer, not consuming their own smoke, are accruing unnecessary losses; they could avoid this by very simple arrangements, and be large gainers by the improvement.
As to the Vartry being poisoned by any trifling driblet which may flow into it from the Mine referred to, it is very doubtful; the true cause of the scantiness of fish in the lough and the river is the conversion of the harbour into an open cesspool for the sewage of the town and the vessels frequenting it. Proper sanitary arrangements might in a great degree obviate this also.
It is very disheartening to find that in the present advanced stage of the world's civilization and enlightenment, whether from some peculiar idiosyncrasy, or whatever cause, there is in Ireland not only an ignorance of but an indifference to learning the right means of developing its industrial resources - that, even among the talented and estimable of the rank and wealth of the community, there is a disposition to pooh-pooh, no matter how practical, every project. More particularly disheartening is it to find that the smells of the manufactory or the workshop can motivate some to object to the founding of an industry which would raise the labourer from earning one shilling a day, to the position of an artisan earning three to five shillings a day. Make two traders thrive where one starved before, and otherwise conduce to the material prosperity of the country.
No wonder that Fenianism stalks through the land, and other disturbing influences exist to arrest the investment of capital in many of its languishing resources, when those who should be the foremost to further its advancement, are so apathetic, so wanting in that co-operative and energetic action which is the mainspring of the onward progress of our
near neighbours in England and Scotland.
I am, Sir, A Projector, October 5th, 1865.