Author Topic: GRO says no - QUINN  (Read 1581 times)

Offline heatherjulie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,705
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: GRO says no - QUINN
« Reply #9 on: Friday 05 April 13 12:24 BST (UK) »
There is a marriage for a Patrick Quinn to either Ellen Mulhern or Ellen Mulloy in 1850 Manchester

Offline dawnsh

  • Global Moderator
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 15,549
    • View Profile
Re: GRO says no - QUINN
« Reply #10 on: Friday 05 April 13 14:44 BST (UK) »
Hi

When you order 'regimental' certificates from the GRO, they must be treated as 'Overseas' events even though they occured in England. Once you have navigated to the overseas section, you have a freeform text box in the order screen after you enter the name to enter the regiment, place, volume and page details.

If you ordered it as an England event, the GRO's system will reject it as the volume and page numbers do not match with those being used in Manchester registration districts at that time.

Although the certificate should contain her mothers maiden name (it might not), it won't contain her parents ages.

Dawn
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Sherry-Paddington & Marylebone,
Longhurst-Ealing & Capel, Abinger, Ewhurst & Ockley,
Chandler-Chelsea

Offline Yenram

  • RootsChat Extra
  • **
  • Posts: 42
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: GRO says no - QUINN
« Reply #11 on: Saturday 06 April 13 01:59 BST (UK) »
Hello Dawn  :)   I didn't understand that England had 2 systems for ordering Birth Certificates if 1 was for a Regimental Birth.  I had a little light bulb moment  ;D  I keep thinking Australian System where ALL births come from the same Government Department.  Thank you so much for helping me