No doubt we will all agree to differ on our first thoughts/impressions/ongoing discoveries of the newly launched service - its style, ease/non ease of use, cost and otherwise....and that is an entirely healthy state of being and should be encouraged.
It is only by expressing these differences in thoughts/impressions etc, that a more full and clear picture can be built of what is good and what is not so good, which will perhaps be eventually a source of suggestions for the powers that be behind the new service to tweak and adjust if/as they see fit.
For my part, in genealogy matters, my glass is almost full, yet those negative thoughts that dominate my 'first impressions' assessment earlier are still there and as valid as others negative and/or positive thoughts, whether their glass/es is/are empty, quarter-full, half-full or otherwise.
After all, if mistakes weren't made, learning wouldn't occur. If healthy debate wasn't aired, we would all be in the dark as to positive points/usage tips and negative points/usage tips experienced by others. We can all learn together (and at times, praise or moan together too
).
Certainly, I look forward to reading further posts on this thread in the days and weeks ahead,
meantime I still think that GRONI et al need to look to some well established and rounded off wheels for ideas, as theirs seems to have been re-invented a bit square (albeit with some quality aspects therein).
