Daniel b. 9 Aug Huruksela Rysa parents: Henrik Heikki Henrikkson Rysa 1833-1868 and Ann Maria Syvesterdotter 1837 -1896.Kalamies Farm Anjala Finland.
Do I take this is he and move on? Or keep digging for further records that cant prove this to be incorrect?
Hi again Velcro...
Before you accept the above Daniel as your Daniel you should first take a look at the relevant Rippikirja (Communion Book) for Kymi, which covers Huruksela. It would need to cover the 1857 marriage and the 1860 birth.
Finding the family is the least you should do before you accept this Daniel as, for all we know, he may have died an early death which would have been noted in the Communion Book.
Or he may have been an only son meaning there is no older brother Andrew (Anders), which would also have been noted.
Unfortunately the relevant Communion Book has yet to be digitised. And it's actually two Communion Books that you need to view. Here is a link to the microfilm list. You somehow need to view I:13 and I:15 found on rolls TK 833 and TK 834
http://hiski.genealogia.fi/seurakunnat/srk?CMD=FILMS&ID=261&TYPE=HTML&LANG=EN-----
I don't know if you're interested but if you're anywhere near a LDS Family History Centre you could always have LDS post the microfilms out to you. You can order them online and you only pay for postage (about A$7.00 per item). You'd want to order Film 58322 which contains I:13 and Film 58323 which contains I:15
Hope the link works...
http://tinyurl.com/b5dpdjtIf not, go to
https://www.familysearch.org/catalog-search and enter 58322 into the Film Search.
You might also want to have a look at the following microfiche which cover Huruksela over the same time period. The Pre-confirmation Records (Lastenkirja) detail the children of the parish.
http://tinyurl.com/algv5r5Again, if the link doesn't work go to
https://www.familysearch.org/catalog-search and enter 6363980 into the Film Search.
-----
Having said all that, personally I wouldn't bother tracing this Daniel until you're running out of things to do :-)
Mainly because on his
naturalisation papers your Daniel says his father's name is Aaron. It really can't be clearer than that.
He also says he was born in Priastad, which I'd put money on being Brahestad.
So that's zero for three for Daniel, son of Henrik (not Aaron), born in Huruksela (350 miles away from Brahestad), on 9 Aug 1860 (not 15 Aug 1860)
-----
At age 14yrs Daniel left Finland with his older brother and sailed to England
If he arrived in Australia in 1883 (aged 23) having spent two years in NZ and four years in England doesn't that mean he left home aged 17 years. Or do you have family history which says he was 14 when he left home.
Regards
Beg