« Reply #146 on: Tuesday 11 December 12 15:47 GMT (UK) »
A family story about his personality might add flavour to your family history but means nothing in tracing facts and generalizations about professions and attitudes going hand in hand tends to muddy the waters of fact finding. This is my opinion not meant to start an argument on this thread.
Perhaps someone thought I was suggesting that anneelaine go looking for "a family story about his personality"...
Quite obviously, I have been suggesting that anneelaine look for family members who know, in particular, the military record of their own Mr. Staveley and his whereabouts during the period in question (around April 1917, and before and after) -- so that it can be investigated to see whether it matches what anneelaine's family knows about their Mr. Staveley.
I have provided anneelaine privately with very specific information about family members of Charles Staveley born in December 1896 (birth reg early 1897) in Bridlington reg dist in Yorkshire, the one who seems to best match her own family's information/stories, at least according to the consensus in this thread.
It is quite possible that the family of "the real Mr. Staveley" might have the exact same photograph in their possession -- or at least a photograph that could be compared for likeness. That would be the very best proof of identity, I would think.
HILL, HOARE, BOND, SIBLY, Cornwall (Devon); DENNIS, PAGE, WHITBREAD, Essex; BARNARD, CASTLE, PONTON, Wiltshire; SANKEY, HORNE, YOUNG, Kent; COWDELL, Bermondsey; COOPER, SMITH, FALLOWELL, WILLEY, Notts; CAMPION, CARTER, CRADDOCK, KENNY, Northants; LITTLER, CORNER, Leicestershire; RUSHLAND, Lincolnshire; MORRISON, Ireland; COLLINS, ?; ... MONCK?