I have a feeling that William Arthur and Henry Arthur are the same child. both born on the 4th of Sept, we had 1878 but that is obviously wrong for Henry Arthur
BDM NZ Births microfiche - 1879/510 - Henry Arthur CHANDLER - Rangiora Q1
Hi again...
1879 and Q1 simply means the event was
registered in the first quarter of 1879. It doesn't mean that's when the event
occured.
Likewise, 510 simply means the event was
registered in the district of Rangiora, not that Rangiora was the district in which the event
occured. (The registration district is found by looking up 510 in the District Keys of 1879, a companion reference book to the BDM NZ fiche)
In this case, I'm still betting that the 1878 baptism and the 1879 registration refer to the same event and that William and Arthur are the same child. Simply because you can narrow down the date of the 1879 registration on the BDM NZ website. And in this case the following birth can be narrowed down using the "Search From" and "Search To" boxes to 4 Sep 1878
BDM NZ Website - 1879/3102 - CHANDLER, Henry Arthur - mother: Ellen father: Thomas - d.o.b 4 Sep 1878To further complicate things 1879/510 found on the BDM NZ Births
fiche and 1879/3102 found on the BDM NZ
website refer to the same event, even though they have different reference numbers
----
Thanks Lucy for the info re the Baptism CD
Regards
Beg