Author Topic: pc.security  (Read 5351 times)

Offline GOODDOG

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 147
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: pc.security
« Reply #27 on: Sunday 11 November 12 14:30 GMT (UK) »
When i asked  for Security advice i never intended that people would argue with themselves.  i know we all have our own opinions.  All i wanted was advice re different companies and prices if possible.

I have been given advice, and  other security names.  As Midase says the final decision is up to me.

Many thanks to all who replied. 

     Michael :-\

Offline Michael J

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 352
    • View Profile
Re: pc.security
« Reply #28 on: Sunday 11 November 12 15:28 GMT (UK) »
As distinct from each person's idea of which antivirus is best, this is a link to a website that checks each a/v program's effectiveness and publishes the results - including this very easy to understand chart:

http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/latest_comparative/index

Michael J.

Offline KGarrad

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,914
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: pc.security
« Reply #29 on: Sunday 11 November 12 15:37 GMT (UK) »
Except:

No Norton
No AVG
No Comodo

Just to name the first three that came to mind?!
Garrad (Suffolk, Essex, Somerset), Crocker (Somerset), Vanstone (Devon, Jersey), Sims (Wiltshire), Bridger (Kent)

Offline Michael J

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 352
    • View Profile
Re: pc.security
« Reply #30 on: Sunday 11 November 12 15:47 GMT (UK) »
AVG is in the chart - look for the initials at 80%/80%. As regards the other two the website states this:

The latest VB100 test on Windows 7 generally saw better product stability than expected, although a lower pass rate than the last test - one third of products failing to achieve VB100 certification this time.
The detection figures from any test during which a product generated false positives are omitted.

Michael.


Offline KGarrad

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,914
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: pc.security
« Reply #31 on: Sunday 11 November 12 16:01 GMT (UK) »
Hmmm!

Norton wasn't even tested?
Comodo failed.
AVG was there - I missed it before :-[

And, easy to understand?
VB100? Not defined anywhere?
RAP - yet another TLA (Three Letter Acronym).

Sorry! Not impressed.
Garrad (Suffolk, Essex, Somerset), Crocker (Somerset), Vanstone (Devon, Jersey), Sims (Wiltshire), Bridger (Kent)

Offline Michael J

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 352
    • View Profile
Re: pc.security
« Reply #32 on: Sunday 11 November 12 16:25 GMT (UK) »
Have you checked the website?

Michael.

Offline KGarrad

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,914
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: pc.security
« Reply #33 on: Sunday 11 November 12 18:06 GMT (UK) »
I did indeed check the website!

Clicked on your link.
Then under "View Results" I clicked on "Click Here" (to find out which products earned a VB100 award, and which failed to make the grade.)

No mention of Norton in that list! ???

Alphabetical list runs from Sophos to Tencent.
Garrad (Suffolk, Essex, Somerset), Crocker (Somerset), Vanstone (Devon, Jersey), Sims (Wiltshire), Bridger (Kent)

Offline wyndham

  • --
  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 391
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: pc.security
« Reply #34 on: Sunday 11 November 12 19:46 GMT (UK) »
Panda also seems to be missing!

Offline Nick29

  • Deceased † Rest In Peace
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • ********
  • Posts: 6,273
    • View Profile
Re: pc.security
« Reply #35 on: Sunday 11 November 12 22:49 GMT (UK) »

As for free stuff, not everyone is flush with money to purchase top of the range and often bloated software.


Me, flush ?  I don't think so.  However, if you can afford a computer, you can afford protection software. 

I don't think you can call Eset 'bloated' - it is one of the few that use pre-compiled code which actually reduces CPU loading.
RIP 1949-10th January 2013

Best Wishes,  Nick.

Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk