I agree with most of what's been said.
I didn't like the formulaic "and for the next part of the story, we need to go to the .......". It was telling her a story, rather than research. The story itself was interesting, though, and that was a VERY rude poem about her ancestor.
It was interesting that they covered the "Glorious Revolution" in the same week that Michael Portillo tackled some of the myths around this event in the fabulous Radio 4 series "Things we forgot to remember".