Brompton on Swale

[feinstein48]

avm 228,
thanks for that information. That adds up, as there was talk that the family originated in the South of England.

Pete

[feinstein48]

avm 228,
Did Susan marry a man with the surname Simpson by any chance? My grandfather always gave his name as Charles Edward Simpson Turner!

Pete

[avm228]

avm 228,
thanks for that information. That adds up, as there was talk that the family originated in the South of England.

Yes, it fits with the birthplace of Elizabeth from the 1891 census when she had her grandson with her - recorded as "High Labour, Essex" but it must be High Laver.

[avm228]

avm 228,
Did Susan marry a man with the surname Simpson by any chance? My grandfather always gave his name as Charles Edward Simpson Turner!

Not sure yet and I've got to go offline now - will have another look later if the question hasn't been answered.

 

[Pels.]

Did Susan marry a man with the surname Simpson by any chance? My grandfather always gave his name as Charles Edward Simpson Turner

Susan Turner (21) and baby "Chas." (6mo b Catterick) are back in High Laver in 1881: RG11/1740/5/3.

I think Susan possibly marries in Ongar district in 1883.

Marriage, Jun qtr 1883   
Thomas Peacock    
Susan Turner        
Ongar, Vol 4a, page 257

Assuming if this was the case Thomas would have to have died and Susan remarried, using the name of Peacock. I can't find any such marriage apart from a Peacock/Simpson marriage in Stockton, 1927 which sounds highly unlikely.

Having said that, I can't find the above couple in 1891 either ?

Pels.

[Pels.]

Assuming if this was the case Thomas would have to have died and Susan remarried, using the name of Peacock. I can't find any such marriage apart from a Peacock/Simpson marriage in Stockton, 1927 which sounds highly unlikely.

Having said that, I can't find the above couple in 1891 either ?

This might explain it :

Death, Mar qtr 1890
Thomas Peacock, age 26   
Ongar, Vol 4a, page 187

It could also answer why Charles was with his grandmother in 1891 ?

Pels.

[Pels.]

A possible Thomas Peacock in 1881 - adding a couple of years on to his age :

https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/XQZ6-CRG

Birth, Sep qtr 1864   
Thomas Peacock     
Ongar, Vol 4a, page 83

Pels.

[Pels.]

Marriage, Dec qtr 1890 
Susan Peacock       
Ongar, Vol 4a, page 425   

To either John Holgate, or Samuel Marrable.

Pels.

[Pels.]

This is getting so confusing and I only hope it's right. 
Otherwise I'll be coming back with a thousand red faces.

1901 census :
RG13/1643, Folio 6, Page 4

Essex, High Laver
Matching Green

John Holgate, h, mar, 41, Hay Straw Binder, High Laver
Susan, wife, 40. b. High Laver

Pels.