392 ( xvi) looks like K.R.
B.1.A.0.11
10.8.looks like 17 VV
Hi Mary
There are actually two regulations quoted here. You have to remember that these cards were not designed to be published, and being for internal use many shortcuts were taken. The first line (already explained) is the cause of discharge.
The rest is why he was allowed the Silver War Badge. It actually reads
Bi AO II 10.8.17 WThe ‘II’ are roman numerals and not the number eleven. It is an amendment to the original Army Order 265.
‘Bi’ is actually 2.B.i – “(i) After service overseas in the armed Forces of the Crown, on account of disablement or ill-health caused otherwise than by misconduct”,
W is for wounds, so he must have been wounded before 11 November 1919 and discharged three months later. You could look for his name in a local newspaper for a list of wounded, starting a few months before the armistice.
‘List’ on his medal card is also a clue to the fact he was awarded a SWB. Ancestry have it here -
http://search.ancestry.co.uk/iexec?htx=View&r=5538&dbid=2456&iid=wo329_3181-00056&fn=Andrew&ln=Kelly&st=r&ssrc=&pid=681151If you look at his medal card again you will see that he was also awarded the British War Medal.
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documentsonline/medals.aspKen