Author Topic: Date of death on gravestone appears to be wrong - is this usual?  (Read 9107 times)

Offline eadaoin

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,625
  • Reilg Chill Barróg
    • View Profile
Re: Date of death on gravestone appears to be wrong - is this usual?
« Reply #9 on: Tuesday 28 August 12 21:02 BST (UK) »
The gravestone on my avatar has two errors of date
- one I can understand, as I'm pretty sure it was engraved 30 years later after another death
- I've no idea how the other occurred.

And another family grave in that cemetery is also wrong!

eadaoin
Begg - Dublin, Limerick, Cardiff
Brady - Dublin
Breslin - Wexford, Dublin
Byrne - Wicklow
O'Hara - Wexford, Kingstown
McLoghlin - Roscommon
Lawlor - Meath, Dublin
Lynam - Meath and Renovo, Pennsylvania
Everard - Meath
Fagan - Dublin
Meyler/Myler - Wicklow
Gray - Derry, Waterford
Kavanagh - Limerick

Offline LizzieW

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,036
  • I'm nearer to finding out who you are thanks DNA
    • View Profile
Re: Date of death on gravestone appears to be wrong - is this usual?
« Reply #10 on: Wednesday 29 August 12 11:42 BST (UK) »
Seems to have been a recurrent problem. 

Offline Ruskie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,276
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Date of death on gravestone appears to be wrong - is this usual?
« Reply #11 on: Wednesday 29 August 12 11:52 BST (UK) »
Lizzie, is this a transcription of the Headstone, or have you seen the actual stone? A transcription could be incorrect. The numbers 5 and 8 especially when carved in stone, can look very similar.

Offline suey

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,843
  • The light is on but there's no-one at home!
    • View Profile
Re: Date of death on gravestone appears to be wrong - is this usual?
« Reply #12 on: Wednesday 29 August 12 13:16 BST (UK) »
Lizzie, is this a transcription of the Headstone, or have you seen the actual stone? A transcription could be incorrect. The numbers 5 and 8 especially when carved in stone, can look very similar.

Those were my thoughts, especially if the inscriptions are worn.   
All census lookups are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Sussex - Knapp. Nailard. Potten. Coleman. Pomfrey. Carter. Picknell
Greenwich/Woolwich. - Clowting. Davis. Kitts. Ferguson. Lowther. Carvalho. Pressman. Redknap. Argent.
Hertfordshire - Sturgeon. Bird. Rule. Claxton. Taylor. Braggins


Offline JenB

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 17,363
    • View Profile
Re: Date of death on gravestone appears to be wrong - is this usual?
« Reply #13 on: Wednesday 29 August 12 14:31 BST (UK) »
A transcription could be incorrect.

I recently checked a memorial stone for a fellow Rootschatter.

The published transcription of  the stone gave the person's age as 74. When I checked the stone it was quite clear that the age was actually 71  ::)
All Census Look Ups Are Crown Copyright from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline LizzieW

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,036
  • I'm nearer to finding out who you are thanks DNA
    • View Profile
Re: Date of death on gravestone appears to be wrong - is this usual?
« Reply #14 on: Wednesday 29 August 12 14:42 BST (UK) »
I haven't seen the stone but I have a photograph that a kind Rootschatter sent to me and the date is very clearly shown as 1808, see photograph.

Offline Ruskie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,276
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Date of death on gravestone appears to be wrong - is this usual?
« Reply #15 on: Wednesday 29 August 12 14:48 BST (UK) »
Yes it is 58 - in that case it must be the stonemason's error? Perhaps the 5 and 8 weren't written clearly and he got it wrong.  ;)

Offline LizzieW

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 11,036
  • I'm nearer to finding out who you are thanks DNA
    • View Profile
Re: Date of death on gravestone appears to be wrong - is this usual?
« Reply #16 on: Thursday 30 August 12 12:32 BST (UK) »
Quote
Yes it is 58 - in that case it must be the stonemason's error? Perhaps the 5 and 8 weren't written clearly and he got it wrong.

It's the year of her death he got wrong, not her age.  That is correct for her death in 1805.  So he must have carved the stone 3 years after her death, unless he didn't know what the year was.

Offline Ruskie

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 26,276
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Date of death on gravestone appears to be wrong - is this usual?
« Reply #17 on: Thursday 30 August 12 12:46 BST (UK) »
Quote
Yes it is 58 - in that case it must be the stonemason's error? Perhaps the 5 and 8 weren't written clearly and he got it wrong.

It's the year of her death he got wrong, not her age.  That is correct for her death in 1805.  So he must have carved the stone 3 years after her death, unless he didn't know what the year was.

Yes, of course the 5 and the 8 in the year of death ....  :-[
I suppose the stone could have been carved some time after her death. Still likely to have been the stonemason's error or misreading of the dates given to him. Someone sure got it wrong.  ;)