Hodson/ Colepepper marriage

[softly softly]

Found her in 1861!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! RG9 450 4 3. The clue was her mother remarrying. Harriet CAVANAGH 19 Barmaid born Blackfriers-A****try shows Blackburn. Have tried to find a marriage of Harriet under the name Cavanagh-no joy.

John

[louisa maud]

John, I thought someone had already found the marriage Bromley Kent for Edward and Harriet

Must admit didn't check Cavanagh

LM

PS, I did look at this but it was shown she was born Blackburn which put me off, I have corrected it and it should show up in due course

[ShaunJ]

The IGI batch number starts with an I which is a bit unusual - does anyone know what that signifies? (I03639-7)

[louisa maud]

I don't know much about the IGI, hopefully someone might, what does intrigue me is that they are missing from Ancestry and Free BMD's, if it were me I would get in touch with ONS, might be a register office marriage, I do wonder how they compile the marriages online  up to 1921, if these are from the actual ledgers then I don't think anyone can be missed off but you never know, do you ?

Louisa Maud

[ShaunJ]

I searched on the LDS site for an explanation of Batch I....

Whoever contributed this article doesn't know either !

https://familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/IGI_Batch_Number_Descriptions

[louisa maud]

Strange that they are not listed and only shown on IGI

I have found 4 family trees with her name on, her marriage to Edward is there but shown as 2 dates, so whoever these trees belong to hasn't found her marriage, only on IGI it looks like

They were both full age when they married,

I do believe if one orders a cert on line at ONS, doesn't give a reference number, in this case there isn't one, includes as much info as possible, father's name and her rightful surname they will search 3 years, so one could ask for 1863 and 1864 I suppose, if they don't find the relevant information the money I do believe is returned, worth pursuing

Louisa Maud

[louisa maud]

It looks as if this has all been gone through before with the same results almost, no actual marriage found

LM

[ShaunJ]

Here's the earlier thread

http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,503592.0.html

[ShaunJ]

Here is the source detail on film 1042456:

https://www.familysearch.org/search/catalog/show?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fcatalog-search-api%3A8080%2Fwww-catalogapi-webservice%2Fitem%2F334866

It includes the banns book which could explain why there are 2 dates. On the other hand it doesn't appear to include a marriage register. Someone needs to eyeball the original records to get to the bottom of this