Author Topic: Can anyone decipher this census return for me?  (Read 1791 times)

Offline mauricej

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 416
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Can anyone decipher this census return for me?
« Reply #9 on: Thursday 02 August 12 20:57 BST (UK) »


.....then this, perhaps, is her birth:-

Mary Anne Richards,   
   
Birth March 1907 - Haverfordwest  11a  1327




Offline suitcase

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 125
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Can anyone decipher this census return for me?
« Reply #10 on: Thursday 02 August 12 20:58 BST (UK) »
yes, I just found that once I had the death to go on :-)

will order the certificates and see. very sad - would have been my grandfather's little sister

thanks again all,
Suitcase
RICHARD, RICHARDS, OWEN, ROACH - Pembrokeshire.
PORTER, HARRISON, BAINES, LANDRUM, GARDNER, BUTTERWORTH, FOX - Preston/Bolton, Lancs
OWEN/OWENS, JAMES - Cardiganshire
GRACE, HERBERT, LAWSON, BILLINGHAM, STRINGER, SINFIELD - Bedfordshire
TEDDER, NIGHTINGALE, SIMMONDS/SYMONDS - Windsor/London

Offline dobfarm

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 7,953
  • Scarcliffe village Derbyshire
    • View Profile
Re: Can anyone decipher this census return for me?
« Reply #11 on: Thursday 02 August 12 22:31 BST (UK) »
Then why would she appear!  ??? then be crossed out on the 1911 census.

I could understand if she had just died days before just before or even on the census date ~ I think the parents wouldn't have said her name out of habit unless she had just died of recent.
In my opinion the marriage residence is not always the place of birth. Never forget Workhouse and overseers accounts records of birth

Offline Colin Cruddace

  • RootsChat Aristocrat
  • ******
  • Posts: 1,574
  • Looking for GG Grandad... Must have GSH
    • View Profile
Re: Can anyone decipher this census return for me?
« Reply #12 on: Friday 03 August 12 00:59 BST (UK) »
Probably just confused by the questions in the 1911 census, which asks for number of children born to this marriage and how many are still alive.

When listing their children, the deceased were included with their projected age, but there was no provision for date of death.

They did their best to provide the required information, which wasn't quite right, and was crossed out somewhere along the line. It's impossible to say if this was before or after it was handed in, but these mistakes can be an unexpected boon to researching the family.

Colin