Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Date photo postcard please  (Read 823 times)

Offline Jimster

  • I am sorry but my email is not working
  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Date photo postcard please
« on: Monday 16 July 12 22:28 BST (UK) »
This is a photo postcard (13.5cm x 8.5cm), taken in Northumberland,
If I get an approx date it will help me to identify the infant.

Thanks

Offline philipsearching

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,094
  • I was a beautiful baby - what went wrong?
    • View Profile
Re: Date photo postcard please
« Reply #1 on: Tuesday 17 July 12 01:45 BST (UK) »
J Candlish Ruddock had a studio in Bondgate, Alnwick in 1904.  I do not know how long the studio was in operation, but this may help to narrow the timeframe.
Please help me to help you by citing sources for information.

Census information is Crown Copyright http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline jim1

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 24,816
  • ain't life grand
    • View Profile
Re: Date photo postcard please
« Reply #2 on: Tuesday 17 July 12 11:56 BST (UK) »
Difficult to give an accurate date as this was standard wear throughout the Edwardian period,however I would suggest the latter half,1905-10 & possibly up to WW1.

jim
Warks:Ashford;Cadby;Clarke;Clifford;Cooke Copage;Easthope;
Edmonds;Felton;Colledge;Lutwyche;Mander(s);May;Poole;Withers.
Staffs.Edmonds;Addison;Duffield;Webb;Fisher;Archer
Salop:Easthope,Eddowes,Hoorde,Oteley,Vernon,Talbot,De Neville.
Notts.Clarke;Redfearne;Treece.
Som.May;Perriman;Cox
India Kane;Felton;Cadby
London.Haysom.
Lancs.Gay.
Worcs.Coley;Mander;Sawyer.
Kings of Wessex & Scotland
Census information is Crown copyright,from
www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

Offline Jimster

  • I am sorry but my email is not working
  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 108
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Date photo postcard please
« Reply #3 on: Tuesday 17 July 12 14:17 BST (UK) »
Thanks for the replies

There are only two possible candidates for the child, one born in 1900 .... and one born in 1912

I had a feeling this photo could not be taken in 1901, Looks like Jim1 has it spot on.

Thanks

Pages: [1]