probably indicates all staff are now busy with the revamped site and sorting the 1926 in storage, conserving the damaged pages etc in preparation for scanning, just as was done in Engalnd and Wales for the 1921 census. My email of 2 years ago was before that.
Has the
https://nationalarchives.ie/collections/search-the-census/corrections-to-the-census-data/ page got more detailed and longer since it appeared a few weeks ago?
Unfortunately they don't clarify what is additional for the 1901 or and what for the 1911 or what is additional to the filmed but unindexed/untranscribed townlands browsable on Familysearch, would need to work back througfh this thread.
The missing section of Avenue Road, Lurgan 1901 is not mentioned that they sent me the one household return for.
Some townlands (and streets) were transcribed incorrectly and many others entered as the enumerator spelt which resulting in dfferent spellings for the same place 1901 vs 1911 and disagrement with Loganim. As the DED, county and parish are listed on returns and such info will be on cover pages of ledgers etc perhaps the 1926 townland will be corrected to official spelling. I would't expect for there to be more than 32 counties just because an enumerator wrote Co. Monahan. At the same time I'm happy for them to leave the Roman Caholick and Prisbyterians, and fornames as written, the denomination mispellings are itemised & selectable on the new site.
They state that Corcreeny has been added to Co. Down. When I browse Waringstown DED on the old site:
Corcreany (160 houses) + Cornreany (30 houses) is there 1901.
Corcreeny (148 houses) + Cornreany (25 houses) is there 1911.
So really, rather than being missing was spelt wrong 1901 and the same as another, so might have appeared to be missing, but all families were itemised. They are both adjacent in Donaghcloney Parish so 1901 just appeared that everyone in the much larger Corcreeny, between Waringstown & Bleary, was crammed into Cornreany.