Regiment ID continued 2 photos

[biker1]

Help appreciated - info on Regiment etc

[mmm45]

I think hes a Territorial Soldier but cant Id a Regiment.
He has two good conduct stripes and a wound stripe on bottom photograph.

Ady

[biker1]

What makes you think Territorial? (I'm new to this so bear with me) are we still talking WW1 years here?

[speedwobble]

I think it's Royal Garrison Artillery but it could also be Royal Field Artillery.  I am judging this by the shoulder lanyard and belt.  Pity there is no cap badge on view.

Anyone else notice the lack of putees in the lower picrure?

[mmm45]

The elongated shoulder title on top photo looks like a Territorial Force one.....Possibly RGA

Ady

[mmm45]

Both Circa WW1 and bottom one looks like hes convalescing after wounds they dont look like uniform trousers ??

Ady

[speedwobble]

I agree Ady.  Lots of RGA were territorials, plus most RFA uniforms would have had a leather bandolier running from shoulder to waist.

[km1971]

I agree with him being in the TF for the first photograph. A better scan of the shoulder title should show a T then a number followed by his regiment/corps

In the second he is a Regular as part-timers did not earn good conduct pay. The photographs look to be about ten years apart - if they are of the same man. Also no T in the second photograph.

Ken

[biker1]

Thank you 'all' for your help so far. Info that I can add if it helps:

All the photos are relations that lived at the time in West Yorkshire - Halifax, Bradford, Keighley and surrounding areas.

I have blown up the first photo best I can and I would say that the shoulder badge does not incorporate a 'T', it certainly has something that stands up-right to one side of the whole badge though.

They are not of the same man, to give a bit of back-ground, the man with the 2 good conduct stripes is the brother of the girl in the first image.

Good point re the trousers/no putees - his trouser do look like serge though?