FindMyPast are getting most of the work because of their connection with TNA. I still think that archives and FHS's are letting people down by using FindMyPast as their search engine is pathetic
I do agree with this statement. Some people knock Ancestry, but in my opinion it is a more user friendly database than FindMyPast; I also think it's better value for money than FindMyPast. I first subscribed to Ancestry a number of years ago, then when FindMyPast exclusively had the 1911census I took a subscription with them. For two years I've subscribed to both sites and do use both, but use Ancestry far more than FindMyPast, FindMyPast has the edge for census address searches and does have some good parish register entries, however, as most of my ancestry lies in Yorkshire Ancestry's West Yorks records cover my own research requirements; I find I use FindMyPast mostly to help other researchers, not for my own FH, which moves me on to another point - Ancestry allow us to post census details etc to forums, FindMyPast's T&C's don't.
The Ancestry West Yorks nonconformist records are fantastic, and I cannot criticise Ancestry's indexing of them as I feel confident they were not easy records to index. Most nonconformist records resemble an event 'jotted down' unlike the traditional church records which were entered on individual forms (except the very early ones).
For me Ancestry offers great value for money. Yes, some of their transcriptions are laughable, but on the whole it's a great database, and I wouldn't want to be without it - warts and all!