« Reply #4 on: Saturday 10 March 12 03:01 GMT (UK) »
It's my belief that graves/cemeteries cannot be disturbed for 100 years after the last burial.
I see from the website below that this appears to be the case :
<< Once interred, human remains cannot be disturbed without a special licence. For well over a century, application had to be made to the Home Office. In 2006, responsibility was transferred along with other burial legislative matters to the Department for Constitutional Affairs. There has, however, been no change to the requirement to apply for a licence in cases where remains are disturbed, even if that disturbance is accidental. Licenses have never been made available for the purpose of reusing a site for burial, although there are many instances of licenses being issued for the removal of bodies from churchyards to facilitate building, road-widening and other developments. >>
http://www.york.ac.uk/chp/crg/crgcontext.htmThat website gives other information and gives other links which may help, such as English Heritage, etc.
P.S. I have just seen a piece about this case and the question of the 50 year rule. I'd be asking if the council applied for and published that they were authorised to change the terms of the original church's "perpetuity/100 year" agreement.
I also noticed the Planning Officer doesn't seem to be aware of the legalities and I hope that he and the council have been informed in writing that they have not dotted all the i's and crossed all the t's when they sold this land.
Aberdeen: Findlay-Shirras,McCarthy: MidLothian: Mason,Telford,Darling,Cruikshanks,Bennett,Sime, Bell: Lanarks:Crum, Brown, MacKenzie,Cameron, Glen, Millar; Ross: Urray:Mackenzie: Moray: Findlay; Marshall/Marischell: Perthshire: Brown Ferguson: Wales: McCarthy, Thomas: England: Almond, Askin, Dodson, Well(es). Harrison, Maw, McCarthy, Munford, Pye, Shearing, Smith, Smythe, Speight, Strike, Wallis/Wallace, Ward, Wells;Germany: Flamme,Ehlers, Bielstein, Germer, Mohlm, Reupke