« Reply #5 on: Sunday 18 March 12 17:26 GMT (UK) »
There was a similar topic a couple of years ago (
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php/topic,442742.10.html ) and here's what I said then :-
I switched from Ancestry to FindMyPast a couple of months ago and have no regrets. They each have their good and bad points which have been highlighted already in this thread. However, what does it for me are the superb transcriptions from FindMyPast. What I particularly like is that the transcription is for a complete household rather than an individual. Also, it gives the address and occupations which an Ancestry transcription doesn't. Best of all is that it usually fits on one screen which makes it easy to do a screen capture or print-out. I have found the odd error in FindMyPast transcriptions just like I did on Ancestry. Once reported FindMyPast make the correction in a matter of days (sometimes within 24 hours) whereas Ancestry can take several weeks to act on a transcription error report.Ancestry may have improved since then so people who use it might like to comment on the points I made at that time. One major change to FindMyPast last November was the addition of the Cheshire archives, a collection of 10 million records spanning the period 1538-1910. This has proved invaluable for my personal research and so my vote would always go to FindMyPast.
Jim
Andrew, Banks, Birchall, Burgess, Burk, Carnell, Cartwright, Clare, Costello, Cragg, Daniels, Gregory, Hague, Hamblett, Hardman, Jackson, Marland, Mee, Mollyneux, Mullin, Naylor, Orford, Owen, Richardson, Robinson, Smith, Street, Tyldsley, Ward, Whalley, Wright
(Mainly Lancs and Cheshire)