« Reply #11 on: Tuesday 03 April 12 09:53 BST (UK) »
I used to totally agree with you Nick, but as of today have changed tack and now am of the same opinion as mofid42.
A person with 800 names on his/her tree has just taken multiple certs and even some photos from my tree over the past few days. Having contacted them to ask where the connection is, and been invited to be a guest to their "private" tree, I have now realised that this person (now describing themselves as a newbie - and admitting their tree is made up of other people's trees) - has not only taken advantage of other people's hard work, but has made a major mistake, having inserted my ancestor and descendants into her branch of the same surname... but in fact there is no genealogical connection at all - totally different family!! Have messaged to advise of this major mistake and await the outcome. This is doubly upsetting as some of the photos taken were sent to me by other ancestr... members who like me are into "sharing" in the true sense - not just "taking" !!!
Now about to decide to make my tree private - unless this person does a return message reassuring me that they will delete the total mistaken branch from their tree. I await with bated breath!
McNab, Kenney, Johnstone, Carrigan, (Cargan, Kirgan, Corrigan), Toll, Tracey, McNulty, Reilly, Maguire, Loughlin, Banks, McGonagle, Forsyth, McDonald, Michael, Kennedy, Bagnell, Cronan, Dunleavy, McMullan. - Glasgow, Ireland, British Columbia Canada, Manchester New Hampshire USA.