Author Topic: Can this be improved?  (Read 4529 times)

Offline alistquin

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 762
  • Never say Never!
    • View Profile
Re: Can this be improved?
« Reply #18 on: Thursday 19 January 12 08:39 GMT (UK) »
hoobaloo, Many thanks for your contribution!  :)

Prue,
That'll teach me to remember my gender and not to try and multi-task!!  ;D
I was trying to do 3 things at the same time and one of them involved an 1893 DOB. You are quite correct, the baby was born in 1929.

I'm quite happy to photograph the photograph and upload, but I won't be able to do it until late tomorrow or Saturday morning.

Alistair
Quinlan - Glasgow & Ireland + married Hogbin, Best & King, Australia
Winton - Angus
Joyce - Westport, County Mayo, Ireland
Aitkin/Aitken - Roxburghshire, Selkirkshire, Co. Galway, Australia
Taylor - County Tyrone, Skibereen, Loughrea, Liverpool, Beccles
Higgins, Ryan and Kelly - Athenry
White - Clara, Kings County/County Offally
Law - Ayrshire, Argyllshire
Orr - Ayrshire, County Antrim, Australia
Burnett - Kincardineshire, Angus, Clydebank
Carnegie - Kincardineshire

Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,896
    • View Profile
Re: Can this be improved?
« Reply #19 on: Thursday 19 January 12 20:43 GMT (UK) »
Hi Alistair

Here's mine. I've thrown nearly everything at it and then drawn/painted it back in and added a tiny bit of texture  :)


gnu
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=877762.0

Offline alistquin

  • RootsChat Veteran
  • *****
  • Posts: 762
  • Never say Never!
    • View Profile
Re: Can this be improved?
« Reply #20 on: Saturday 21 January 12 11:16 GMT (UK) »
gnu, Many thanks for that - I'm certain it wasn't a 5 minute job!  ;D

Prue,
As promised, here is a photograph of the photograph. I've taken over a dozen as the light this morning is very bright and I can't seem to get one just right. I'm posting one of the lighter ones but if there is too much light bleeding in I can post a darker version.

Alistair
Quinlan - Glasgow & Ireland + married Hogbin, Best & King, Australia
Winton - Angus
Joyce - Westport, County Mayo, Ireland
Aitkin/Aitken - Roxburghshire, Selkirkshire, Co. Galway, Australia
Taylor - County Tyrone, Skibereen, Loughrea, Liverpool, Beccles
Higgins, Ryan and Kelly - Athenry
White - Clara, Kings County/County Offally
Law - Ayrshire, Argyllshire
Orr - Ayrshire, County Antrim, Australia
Burnett - Kincardineshire, Angus, Clydebank
Carnegie - Kincardineshire

Offline onetiger

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Can this be improved?
« Reply #21 on: Saturday 21 January 12 18:16 GMT (UK) »
My effort, when it's all boiled down, is a compromise between blur and noise.


Offline Gadget

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 57,896
    • View Profile
Re: Can this be improved?
« Reply #22 on: Saturday 21 January 12 19:14 GMT (UK) »
Just turning Alistair's photo around so that we can all see it more easily.

gnu

PS - Alistair it was more like a day's work if I add in all the inspections before I touched it - but I always do that with images   ;D
Census &  BMD information Crown Copyright www.nationalarchives.gov.uk and GROS - www.scotlandspeople.gov.uk

***Restorers - Please do not use my restores without my permission. Thanks***

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=877762.0

Offline PrueM

  • RootsChat Honorary
  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 12,637
  • Please don't try to PM me :)
    • View Profile
Re: Can this be improved?
« Reply #23 on: Saturday 21 January 12 22:23 GMT (UK) »
Thanks Alistair (and gnu :) )

It's a curly one.  I'm still not 100% sure, but I think having seen your photo of the photo, that it might be a print on uncoated paper - something like a salted paper print (see here http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/coll/589_salted.html).  That makes me think that it's a home-made photo, done by someone experimenting with old techniques.

I could be completely off the mark with this but that's what the surface appearance suggests to me!

The other option would be a paper with a matting agent (such as fine silica) applied to the surface, but I've only ever seen this type of paper used with fine studio prints, and the surface is much finer with the grains only apparent using magnification, so I don't really think this is the answer.

So, in short, I'm still puzzled  ;D  But thank you for letting me indulge my curiosity  :)  And you have had some great restorations done too, on a difficult photo  :)

Cheers
Prue