Author Topic: Update on the ruined cottage at Barley  (Read 26730 times)

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,147
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Update on the ruined cottage at Barley
« Reply #54 on: Saturday 07 January 12 23:48 GMT (UK) »
Just noticed, it seems to have a date stone over its door - can't quite read it though.  15?2 is it?


I think it says 1532

Certainly looks like that, either that or 1582.
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Greensleeves

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 4,505
    • View Profile
Re: Update on the ruined cottage at Barley
« Reply #55 on: Saturday 07 January 12 23:49 GMT (UK) »
Here is a small pic I've found showing an ancient font, which looks similar to the one in the field.
Suffolk: Pearl(e),  Garnham, Southgate, Blo(o)mfield,Grimwood/Grimwade,Josselyn/Gosling
Durham/Yorkshire: Sedgwick/Sidgwick, Shadforth
Ireland: Davis
Norway: Torreson/Torsen/Torrison
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline bishenbertie

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 372
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Update on the ruined cottage at Barley
« Reply #56 on: Saturday 07 January 12 23:50 GMT (UK) »
I've just seen the picture of the font in the field, I hope it can be saved.

Wonderful stuff, better than time team.

Thanks for sharing your photos with us.
Westbrook - London, Oxford
Squibb, Brooks - London
Kingcombe, Parsons, Penny, Crocker, Brooks - Devon

Offline Maggie.

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,152
  • I haven't a clue about my Roots
    • View Profile
Re: Update on the ruined cottage at Barley
« Reply #57 on: Saturday 07 January 12 23:51 GMT (UK) »
There again, Maggie, that is a very handsome little building for a farmhouse. Was the area particularly prosperous in the 16th/17th centuries? People living at subsistence level generally just threw together hovels to live in, but that certainly isn't a hovel!

Yes - it's a substantial farmhouse and one of several in the valley.  They belonged to the up and coming yeoman farmers of the 16th C.  

Initially - and I hope I get this correct as I'm not consulting notes, the Forest of Pendle, after the Norman conquest, was owned by the King for hunting purposes.  Later the land was granted to the De Lacy earldom and when it ceased to be used for hunting purposes the forest was then given over to tennant farmers.  Prior to this time, because it was hunting territory, there were few people living here, the population generally was principally employed in farming, stock management and the vaccary system predominated.

By the 16thC, due to the decimation of the population through plague and Henry VIII's policies, an opportunity was given for these tennant farmers to acquire more land, their sole aim was to improve their social standing and become minor gentry.  Around this time many of the finest farmhouses were built.

This is an over-simplification of a complex subject and it's written in a rush .... so I hope it's a fairly accurate account
Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk


Offline Maggie.

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,152
  • I haven't a clue about my Roots
    • View Profile
Re: Update on the ruined cottage at Barley
« Reply #58 on: Saturday 07 January 12 23:56 GMT (UK) »
Just noticed, it seems to have a date stone over its door - can't quite read it though.  15?2 is it?

I think it says 1532

Certainly looks like that, either that or 1582.

I think it's 1532 but I would need to double-check that.

Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline bishenbertie

  • RootsChat Senior
  • ****
  • Posts: 372
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: Update on the ruined cottage at Barley
« Reply #59 on: Saturday 07 January 12 23:56 GMT (UK) »
Forest of Pendle is a good way up the country for me to be doing a day trip that's a shame.

Thanks for all the information Maggie very interesting indeed.
Westbrook - London, Oxford
Squibb, Brooks - London
Kingcombe, Parsons, Penny, Crocker, Brooks - Devon

Offline Maggie.

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,152
  • I haven't a clue about my Roots
    • View Profile
Re: Update on the ruined cottage at Barley
« Reply #60 on: Saturday 07 January 12 23:58 GMT (UK) »
I would think a local museum would be very interested in that "maybe" font. And moving large objects is reasonably easy if you know what your doing,,and,, the reward is large enough.

Although our history group has only recently been to see it this 'font' has resided in a field as a cattle water feeder for decades.  It is well off the beaten track and on private land.
Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline Maggie.

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,152
  • I haven't a clue about my Roots
    • View Profile
Re: Update on the ruined cottage at Barley
« Reply #61 on: Sunday 08 January 12 00:02 GMT (UK) »
Forest of Pendle is a good way up the country for me to be doing a day trip that's a shame.

Thanks for all the information Maggie very interesting indeed.

Pendle Forest in the middle ages was apparently Wild West country where Southerners travelled at their peril  ;D  ;D

But anyone who wants to make the trip, just let me know.
Census info. Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk

Offline groom

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 21,147
  • Me aged 3. Tidied up thanks to Wiggy.
    • View Profile
Re: Update on the ruined cottage at Barley
« Reply #62 on: Sunday 08 January 12 00:04 GMT (UK) »
Quote
Southerners travelled at their peril

 :o :o :o :o What happened to them?
Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk