Hi JillMD
I'm wondering if the 1857 marriage date might be incorrect - unless there were two couples names James BEATTIE & Jane THOMAS!?
BIRTH:
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~births/Be_Surnames.htm(Northumberland & Durham Co) BEATTY, James, m, b. Nov. 14, 1869,
father : James BEATTY, farmer,
Mother: Jane THOMAS,
infm – father, Hamilton Twp
BIRTH:
Transcript from original
(Northumberland & Durham Co) BEATTY, Jane Elizabeth, f, b 5 mar 1871
Father: James BEATTY, farmer,
mother : Jane THOMAS,
infm – father, Lot 10, Con. A, Hamilton Twp
1871: Hamilton Twp, Northumberland West, Ontario
Head: James BEATTIE 27, b Ontario, Farmer, Irish, Weslyan Methodist
Wife: Jane 25, b Ontario
Son: James 1
Dau: Jane Elizabeth 1 mth
This couple would not have been old enough to marry in 1857 ??
In 1881, this same family in Hamilton, with more children including Charles who looks to be a match for your grandfather who married in 1913.
Is this James in 1861 - prior to marriage, with his siblings & widowed mother:
Hamilton Twp, Northumberland, Upper CanadaJohn BEATTY 24, farmer, single, b W Canada CE
Jane BEATTY 56, b Ireland, NC
Samuel BEATTY 21, Labourer, single, b W Canada, religion: CE
Elizabeth BEATTY 28, single, b Ireland, CE
James BEATTY 18, labourer, single, b W Canada CE
George BEATTY 15, single, b W Canada CE
Mary Jane BEATTY 13, single, b W Canada CE
Cheers
AMBLY