« Reply #7 on: Monday 28 November 11 07:16 GMT (UK) »
Because of the different parishes, you must treat that information with caution, especially those entries that are submitted. The entries that have the following: "Extracted birth or christening record for the locality listed in the record. The source records are usually arranged chronologically by the birth or christening date", are from original sources, and can be accepted as true. However, I would be cautious in selecting entries from different parishes without looking at the original records, because you might find that for example, the John Haydon baptised in 1739 in Crediton might turn out to be an infant death. Burials are mostly not on the IGI.
Now, I am not suggesting you aren't on the right track, but the sources need to be checked to verify your research.
Darren
I am Australian, from all the lands I come (my ancestors, at least!)
Pine/Pyne, Dowdeswell, Kempster, Sando/Sandoe/Sandow, Nancarrow, Hounslow, Youatt, Richardson, Jarmyn, Oxlade, Coad, Kelsey, Crampton, Lindner, Pittaway, and too many others to name.
Devon, Dorset, Gloucs, Cornwall, Warwickshire, Bucks, Oxfordshire, Wilts, Germany, Sweden, and of course London, to name a few.