Thanks Pels and Bashlad
I think I may have seen that baptism before but I discounted it because it said James was a stonemason and not a builder. I may be wrong but I would have thought that if Elizabeth’s father was a stonemason it would have said so on her marriage certificate, although I guess a stonemason is a builder.
This morning I found other baptisms for the same parents, living in Lansdowne Place:
James Johnson, baptised on 10 January 1838 son of James & Mary, stonemason
William Williams Johnson, baptised 11 November 1839, son of James & Mary, stonemason
Ellen Johnson, baptised 27 March 1845, daughter of James & Mary, stonemason
I believe that this is the above family in 1841 before Elizabeth and Ellen were born:
HO107 Piece 519 Book 3 Enumeration District 6 Folio 22 Page 11
Lansdowne Place
James Johnson 25 (29 was crossed out) Stonemason, Y
Mary, 25 (26 was crossed out), Y
James, 3, Y
William, 2, Y
Ann Neals, 15, FS, I
Not sure if this is them in 1851 as Mary’s age is wrong:
HO107 / 2190 / 8 / 8
38 Ellison Street, Everton
Mary Johnson, Head, widow, 30, Everton
Ellen, Daughter, 6, Everton
Mary, Daughter, 4, Everton
Richard, Son, 12m, Everton
Ann Beasly, Serv, U, 25, Northwich
I somehow don’t think it is the same the only thing that is right is Ellen’s age.
It also doesn’t help explaining where Elizabeth was in 1851 and 1861
I won’t completely discount the baptism but I’m not sure enough to order a birth certificate based on that and the only extra information would be Elizabeth’s date of birth and Mary’s maiden name any way.
On double checking Elizabeth as Armitage in 1871 and 1881 her age is not consistent which I thought it was in 1871 she is 24 and in 1881 she is 36.
This may have to stay in the too hard basket still.
Thanks again
Gail