Author Topic: King / Earl (e) / McQuillan  (Read 5241 times)

Offline J.J.

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,183
  • Census Crown © www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: King / Earl (e) / McQuillan
« Reply #18 on: Friday 21 October 11 23:33 BST (UK) »
heehee, Debbie, Jeff already gave that obit...but I don't see it on either of your urls so I'll submit a direct url... http://obits.dignitymemorial.com/dignity-memorial/obituary.aspx?n=Cecilia-Earl&lc=3890&pid=146769924&mid=4445539 just hit "Read Complete" to expand...
Nice find Jeff, confirms the obit. Jardiner has done well on one of her first looks into rootschat...way to go guys and gals...You're good!
♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥  Always looking out for the BHC  ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡
           In recognition of the homechildren, their plight & their achievements!

"We search for information, but the burden of proof is always with the thread owner" J.J.

Offline cosmac

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 3,412
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: King / Earl (e) / McQuillan
« Reply #19 on: Saturday 22 October 11 00:30 BST (UK) »
Sometimes you read and just don't let your brain process the information properly!!

Debbie

Offline J.J.

  • RootsChat Marquessate
  • *******
  • Posts: 10,183
  • Census Crown © www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: King / Earl (e) / McQuillan
« Reply #20 on: Saturday 22 October 11 04:20 BST (UK) »
Hi Debbie... I did put the name Cecila Earl into the search line and it didn't work...so I just went and found it as a direct url as that's easier for me and so perhaps others as well. But you are correct, I don't always process information properly. Comes with age, I guess and major sinus head!!  ;D I'll give myself a rollie eyes!  ::)   all the best, J.J.

Just occurred to me maybe you thought with the heehee, I was laughing at you, but I was laughing at the fact that I couldn't find something ...again!
♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥  Always looking out for the BHC  ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡ ♥ ♡
           In recognition of the homechildren, their plight & their achievements!

"We search for information, but the burden of proof is always with the thread owner" J.J.

Offline Jardiner

  • RootsChat Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
  • Census information Crown Copyright, from www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
    • View Profile
Re: King / Earl (e) / McQuillan
« Reply #21 on: Sunday 23 October 11 15:24 BST (UK) »
Hi Cosmac,Jacquie and jeffster.

Reading your postings has me delving more into what I've got and may be slightly different from the info posted.

I'll start with the letter. As I say, the writer refers to Rachel and Minnie as Aunties and given context in which it is said it would appear that neither of them are her mother but they are older than her. It's possible she is either a child of their sibling or indeed of a sibling of their partners but as she is familiar with their brother (uncle Alf) it would seem more likely it's a sibling of theirs and therefore who can it be? I can date the letter to the 1960s and indeed to after 1962 for the following extract. "Bill got married on the 5th Sept... Auntie was telling me Fred is married..." Fred is my Uncle (my Father's brother) and he was married on 15/10/1962.

Another area of doubt is Mclellan V Mcquillan. It is possible Kathleen is married to Mclellan but we must not mix this up with mcquillan as he was married, almost certainly  to Rachel (as opposed to Minnie - as per original posting).

Thanks all for all the info - It has me really looking much deeper into the lives of these great aunts.

jardiner