The 1837 marriage record is the actual Marriage Certificate, not the Banns. It's only just after the start of Civil reg. Perhaps the minister was somewhat confused as to what he should have been doing! Instead of naming the father of the respective pair, he has written in the person/guardian (Maybanks) who permitted the marriage of a minor - which is what the minister would have done on a parish record prior to civil reg.
MARRIAGE Certificate - Solemnized in Christ Church in the Parish of St Marylebone on 17 Jul 1837 St Marylebone, after Banns:
George JEANS, full age, Bachelor, of 34 Blackburn Mews
Mary Ann HUTCHINS, minor, Spinster, of 8 King Street
Occupation : Servant has been written in the middle of them both
Father's Name: Richard MAYBANK, clerk, has been written in the middle of them both.
Rich'd MAYBANK is also one of the witness'.
Other witness: S E BLABY
Bride & Groom both signed their own names, Mary Ann more legibly than George.
The banns themselves, are also on record - but don't give anything away aside form their names & marital status. The last call was the day before the actual marriage.
1841: Not a large institution - it appears to me that the enumerator has simply omitted to follow the instuction to a) place a // after each seperate dwelling/household and b) place a / after each seperate group within that household where the / marks the (probable) family unit (parents & children) then / relatives / visitors/ lodgers/ servants etc..
Instead, the enumerator has written
Do. (ditto) to cover two jobs, 1) to mark the start of each household and 2) to say it's on the same street as the previous household(s). You have to go a few pages back to see the
Do. in this case is (apparently) indicating "Stafford Steet". Image attached, red marks mine are a guess as to how it may have looked at least in part, if done proper
Richard MAYBANK's 1841 household appears to be:Stafford Street (written a few pages back), St Marylebone
Do.Rich'd MAYBANK, 50, Clerk, - N
Catherine MAYBANK 45 - N
Rich'd MAYBANK 20, Butcher - Y
John MAYBANK 15 - Y
Mary ------MAN 70, - N
Harriot ------MAN 30, - N
Samuel HUTCHING?? 30, Harness?? Maker?, b Scotland
Sarah BLABY 20 - Y
Sarah HITCH 60, Ind - N
Ann BISHOP 60 - Y
Do.The image is not too good (a scan of it would possibly be more clear, as opposed to a photocopy - you could try asking the source of the image if they can produce a scan).
The Samuel fellow looks mightily interesting - and remember, ages were supposed to be rounded in 1841 and look as if they have been here - he could be as old as 34. He might be an older brother of Mary Ann HUTCHING? Too young to be a father, perhaps?
And Sarah BLABY in 1841 could be as old as 24, and is perhaps likely to be the 2nd marriage witness in 1837.
I would also hazard a little guess that Mary ----MAN and Harriot ----MAN could be mother & sister of Richard's wife.
Cheers
AMBLY
