I'm not sure it is the correct child, Sluggie - I just said it was a tempting possibility, given that Mary Ann was known as Polly.
Casalguidi, we're just trying to pin down the 4th child of the "marriage" of Nathan and Mary Ann (Polly) who was dead by the 1911, and I suggested this child's birth which is, as Sluggie says, in the right sort of area.
We'd need a punt on the certificate, but I wouldn't be surprised that wishful thinking proved not to be correct.
Whatever the likelihood, dreadful to have 8 children and lose 4.
Goldcoast and I have subsequently tracked down the family of the daughter of Mary Ann Cork/Cooley/Evenden, Mary Ann/Marian (she of the blind school in the 1901 which you miraculously turned up, Casalguidi) and she also very sadly lost children, including one, we think, at the age of 11 in 1938. Infant mortality isn't confined to the 19th century.
I am consistently reminded how lucky I am to be here.